http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters?bid=45&pid=309462JUST A SMALL TOWN GIRL?...
Ari Berman
John McCain ditched his disabled first wife after Vietnam and married a rich beer heiress twenty years his junior.
Bill and Hillary Clinton made $109 million over the last eight years and sold the Lincoln Bedroom to the highest bidder when in the White House.
And now both McCain and Clinton are deriding Barack Obama as "elitist."
Give me a break. When Clinton was on the board of Wal-Mart and McCain was getting reprimanded for his role in the Keating 5 scandal, Barack Obama was a civil rights lawyer in Chicago. You tell me which experience better prepares one to understand the struggles of working people.
What Obama said about the bitterness of those in small-town America, stymied by job loss and economic stagnation, was hardly scandalous. It's only a "scandal" because McCain, trying his best to ignore an economic recession, and Clinton, looking for any opportunity to jolt a campaign on life support, said it was--and the media dutifully bought the spin.snip//
The kitchen sink overfloweth yet again.
*******************************
http://www.thenation.com/blogs/campaignmatters?bid=45&pid=309355CLINTON CAMP SEEKS TO SPIN ITS WAY OUT OF PENNSYLVANIA...
John Nichols
snip//
The senator from New York has led by as much as 20 points in credible polls of Pennsylvania voters. In fact, she was so far ahead at one point that there was speculation that Obama might drop back and accept his beating -- on the theory that he could make things up elsewhere. Instead, after a rough March, Obama came back fighting in April with an expensive and effective television advertising campaign, a surprise endorsement from Pennsylvania Senator Bob Casey Jr. and a somewhat -- though certainly not sufficiently -- more populist message on economic issues.
Obama has begun to close the gap in Pennsylvania. But, with barely a week to go before the April 22 primary, he still trails in almost all polls.
If Obama loses Pennsylvania by a narrow margin, he'll sustain a blow but not a particularly serious one. It certainly will not be "a significant defeat for him."
On the other hand, if Clinton loses by even one vote, it will be a significant defeat for her.
Howard Wolfson is trying to rewrite the rules of the expectation game. But Clinton has led in Pennsylvania for too long and by too much to spin a false victory. She needs to win the state by a wide margin if she -- or Wolfson -- hope to make a case for continuing a campaign that has staked its future on the Keystone State.
To suggest otherwise is not political spin.
It is a fantasy too ridiculous even for those who are familiar with Howard Wolfson's creative relationship with the truth to entertain.