Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT: The Unfinished Reforms of 9/11

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 08:42 AM
Original message
NYT: The Unfinished Reforms of 9/11

Published: April 19, 2008
When the independent 9/11 commission warned that the nation’s intelligence defenses were a shambles, Congress embraced nearly every call for reform. Guess which one it didn’t? It has conveniently overlooked the commission’s call to consolidate Congress’s multiple intelligence oversight committees and subcommittees — which ends up leaving no one with real oversight power.

Now the idea has been at least partially revived. In a letter last month to the Senate leadership, 14 of the 15 members of the Intelligence Committee — which oversees intelligence operations — recommended creating a new intelligence subcommittee to oversee appropriations. The subcommittee would include members who sit on both the full intelligence and appropriations panels.

Over on the Senate Appropriations Committee — the jedi masters of the budget universe — top members were not in a compromising mood and quickly volleyed in their own letter insisting that there is no such need. For them to surrender any of their authority, the appropriators declared, would hamper oversight.

We stand with the 9/11 commission that the national interest requires the two houses’ intelligence committees to fully assume appropriation authority. Considering the thicket of egos, the proposed compromise is a start. The overlap would begin to address the situation in which the appropriations committees handle intelligence as only one of many specialties.

more:http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/19/opinion/19sat3.html?ref=opinion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sam sarrha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-19-08 09:25 AM
Response to Original message
1. it happened just like they wanted, "Ben-lade determined to attack within WEEKS OR DAYS" she left off
the incriminating part.. there were about a dozen warnings with "WITHIN WEEKS OR DAYS" the month before.. a cluster of 5 or 6 the week before, 52 warnings from allies national security agencies in the previous months that year.

here is your new mantra.. theyletithappen...theyletithappen...theyletithappen

Shortly before, NeoCon Czar Pearl said what we need to get our program going "is another Pearl Harbor"

read Naomi Klein's 'Shock Doctrine:the rise of disaster capitalism'. not really capitalism..its Fasco-Corporatism. Argentina, Chile, Guatemala, 240,000 tortured to death.... come'n soon RIGHT HERE IN RIVER CITY !!!

her book is the book of the century, not a political rag propaganda piece like the ReThuglicians write, it is an in depth research paper about the ReThug Agenda, installing Milton Friedman's Machiavellian economic theory's not only in the United States but Globally.. Friedman was a psychopath who developed his economic theory's from the work of Dr Evan Cameron who developed Electro shock therapy and the Frontal lobotamy..in an attempt to erase the minds of his patients and rebuild a healthy mind in it's place.. this is plain psychotic Frankenstein madness. this is the platform of the ReThuglican Party..

the book is 558 pages with 92 pages of footnotes and index.. this is a REAL book, it is our last warning..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC