Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Costly Lesson on How Not to Build a Navy Ship

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:13 AM
Original message
Costly Lesson on How Not to Build a Navy Ship
By PHILIP TAUBMAN
Published: April 25, 2008
~snip~

A Shipbuilding Program’s Troubles Moments before the launching on Sept. 23, 2006, Adm. Mike Mullen, the chief of naval operations, told the festive crowd of shipbuilders, politicians and Navy brass assembled at the Marinette Marine shipyard, “Just a little more than three years ago, she was just an idea; now Freedom stands before us.”

Not quite. The ship — the first of a new class of versatile, high-speed combat vessels designed to operate in coastal waters — was indeed bobbing in the river, just four months after the promised launching date. But it was far from finished. In fact, the ship floats there still, work continuing day and night.

A project heralded as the dawning of an innovative, low-cost era in Navy shipbuilding has turned into a case study of how not to build a combat ship. The bill for the ship, being built by Lockheed Martin, has soared to $531 million, more than double the original, and by some calculations could be $100 million more. With an alternate General Dynamics prototype similarly struggling at an Alabama shipyard, the Navy last year temporarily suspended the entire program.

The program’s tribulations speak to what military experts say are profound shortcomings in the Pentagon’s acquisitions system. Even as spending on new projects has risen to its highest point since the Reagan years, being over budget and behind schedule have become the norm: a recent Government Accountability Office audit found that 95 projects — warships, helicopters and satellites — were delayed 21 months on average and cost 26 percent more than initially projected, a bill of $295 billion

more:http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/25/us/25ship.html?ref=washington
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
1. We can't do anything right anymore.
It's like we're the Russians after the fall of Communism. We suck at everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not quite
The Russians have producing oil wells; ours are run dry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Like "The Producers," many corporations have found that failure pays better
than doing it right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Z.e.r.o Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
4. the "Pentagon Wars" pt. Deux
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 08:18 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's not the "aquisition system", it's the corrupt, incompetent weasels in the private sector.
The defense bidness is rotten to the core.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenvpi Donating Member (235 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 08:32 AM
Response to Original message
6. On the positive side
this is one less killing machine on the high seas.

Thankfully we have incompetent and dishonest people supplying the military, or our military would be able to kill even more people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JPZenger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-25-08 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. Lockhead Martin Also Screwed up Coast Guard Cutter Construction
http://seekingalpha.com/article/32751-lockheed-northrop-face-probe-over-coast-guard-program-cost-overruns

The above article describes how Lockhead Martin and Northrup jointly screwed up the construction of a new generation of Coast Guard cutters.

Part of the problem is that contracts seemed to be assigned based upon the political power of the local US Senators and House members vs. past performance and ability.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC