Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Anne Ursu - Primary miniseason won't serve party well

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:22 PM
Original message
Anne Ursu - Primary miniseason won't serve party well
http://www.startribune.com/stories/1519/4620539.html

(snip)

CNN and its ilk had been relentlessly repeating the results of a poll that showed that Kerry would beat the president in a head-to-head battle. But they did not mention that the poll showed Edwards also would win against Bush, with Wesley Clark just a couple of points behind.

Meanwhile, Kerry is racking up the endorsements from politicians who want to rally around the front-runner (or assure their place in a Kerry administration), and his victory is seen as inevitable well before Democratic voters in most states have had their say.

But this early certainty is exactly what Democratic National Committee chair Terry McAuliffe had hoped for. There used to be a six-week break between Iowa and New Hampshire and the rest of the primaries; time for any irrational exuberance from wins in those states to be contained, and time for other candidates to mount their stands. But McAuliffe didn't want the Democratic candidate broke and broken before the battle against Bush even begun, so he "front-loaded" the primaries to ensure a quick and easy victory for one candidate -- any candidate.

(snip)

A long, combative process ensures that the Democrats nominate someone who is up to the election fight. We need the strongest, most formidable, and most thoroughly-vetted candidate possible to survive the battle against Team Bush and its piles of gold.

This drive toward an early coronation belies the entire point of the primary process, which is to pick the man who would be both the best nominee and the best president. Instead, we have picked the man who ran the best race in Iowa, which is hardly the same thing.

(snip)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-22-04 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gee, looks like the media is telling us who we should vote for again.
But, it's OK for them to meddle in this case, cuz it's Kerry that they are trying to stop.

BTW, how old is this story? This line: "Instead, we have picked the man who ran the best race in Iowa, which is hardly the same thing." negates the fact that Kerry's won 15/17 contests to date....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 01:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC