Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

It Was Oil, All Along

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 06:36 PM
Original message
It Was Oil, All Along
It Was Oil, All Along

By Bill Moyers and Michael Winship
June 27, 2008

Oh, no, they told us, Iraq isn't a war about oil.
That's cynical and simplistic, they said.
It's about terror and al Qaeda and toppling a dictator
and spreading democracy and protecting ourselves from weapons of mass destruction.

<snip>
Read on: "Four western companies are in the final stages of negotiations this month on contracts that will return them to Iraq, 36 years after losing their oil concession to nationalization as Saddam Hussein rose to power."

There you have it. After a long exile, Exxon Mobil, Shell, Total and BP are back in Iraq. And on the wings of no-bid contracts – that's right, sweetheart deals like those given Halliburton, KBR, Blackwater. The kind of deals you get only if you have friends in high places.

And these war profiteers have friends in very high places.


<snip>
Fast forward to Cheney’s first heady days in the White House. The oil industry and other energy conglomerates have been handed backdoor keys to the White House, and their CEOs and lobbyists were trooping in and out for meetings with their old pal, now Vice President Cheney.
The meetings are secret, conducted under tight security, but as we reported five years ago, among the documents that turned up from some of those meetings were maps of oil fields in Iraq – and a list of companies who wanted access to them.

More of this excellent article:
http://www.consortiumnews.com/2008/062708b.html


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
libodem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 07:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. Of course it was all about the oil
Edited on Fri Jun-27-08 07:44 PM by libodem
Freedom and Democracy had nothing to do with invading Iraq. In fact 'keeping the world safe for Democracy' was a WWII rallying cry. I suppose most of America didn't recognize that old slogan. What galls me is the over all impact on American morals. There are now good ol' boys everywhere whom think invading for oil is an okay foreign policy maneuver. I've heard guys, I never thought were so crass, say it's okay to torture because they would do the same to us. Regular folk are thinkin' like Nazis because of this mis-adminstration of criminal mobsters. Take what you want because you are bigger, meaner, and more powerful.

PS: Read my sig line, again. Some of us have known from the outset.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-27-08 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Have known it from the outset as well
The article is more of an editorial rant that these crooks are still being given privilege.

I so want the Bush Gang of Thieves to be impeached, arrested, and put away forever :grr:




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. All with an inkling of knowledge and a modicum of common sense have known from the outset that it
was always about the oil, oil for big oil to make trillions of dollars from. :mad: :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Baby Snooks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. And the Democrats in Congress knew it as well...
They can lie along with the Republicans. But they knew. And not only knew but approved it. Approved of this "millions of lives for billions of barrels" policy of the Bush dynasty.

It was worth the lives of 500,000 innocent Iraqi children in 1996 according to Madeline Albright. Who spoke for Bill Clinton. But also spoke for George HW Bush whose policy Bill Clinton had kept in place.

One of the many reasons why Nancy Pelosi kept impeachment off the table was self-preservation. The Empress serves the Emperor. But she also serves herself.

Watch them work. The Republicrats who serve the dynasty. The DINOs and the RINOs. Watch them demand a roll call at the Democratic convention. They would still rather have Hillary Clinton. And if they can't have her they will manage to have Barack Obama choose her as his running mate. Not to ensure he wins. To ensure he loses.

The reality of Barack Obama is he does not serve the dynasty. Hillary Clinton and John McCain do. And will continue to.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yet we continue to be dependent on oil
And do little but blame people from other countries either for existing or having the oil.

Why do we not take a constructive approach and try to minimize our dependency on oil and on the automobile? It boggles the mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
6. it was for the oil, but not for us--so US oil companies could set the price and reap the profits
Myth of oil weapon:

http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2007/11/myth-of-oil-weapon-vs-reality-of.html

The oil deals Bush is pushing on Iraqis screw them so much that his hand-picked parliament won't rubberstamp his corporate drafted oil law:
http://professorsmartass.blogspot.com/2008/01/big-oil-tries-to-bribe-iraqis-to-pass.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-29-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
7. If Dems shifted Iraq debate to oil, the war would be over. Simply turn every debate into
has this made oil cheaper? Does ensure our access or aggravate countries we need good relations with?

Was it worth the cost or should we have invested the same couple of trillion in alternative energy? How many solar & wind plants could we have built for that much? How many hybrid and electric cars? How much more light rail mass transit could we have built?

What are the oil companies giving us BACK for securing oil contracts for them in Iraq?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC