Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beijing does not come in peace

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 02:14 AM
Original message
Beijing does not come in peace
President Chen Shui-bian (???) renamed the "defensive referendum" the "peace referendum" in the hope that Taiwan and China will establish a peaceful and stable interactive framework. Similarly, Chinese President Hu Jintao (???), during his visit to France, said his country is developing "peaceful diplomacy." When Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao (???) visited the US last year, he even described China's rise as a "peaceful ascendancy."

Leaders from both sides are using the word "peace." But we have not seen China's "peaceful ascendancy" bring any peaceful prospect to the relationship across the Taiwan Strait.

Beijing's leaders chose the term "peaceful ascendancy" in response to the shift in US strategy. Since US President George W. Bush took office, the superpower has made efforts to realize its "imperial strategy." Through this strategy, generally called "unilateralism," the US has constantly used its military advantage to interfere around the world, establishing its global leadership and hegemonic system.

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/edit/archives/2004/02/27/2003100337
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Whew!
For a minute there, I thought I was the only one who saw the Neocons as overly agressive! ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
teryang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-27-04 06:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Quickly defeating China?
Is this the view from the Pentagon or Taipei?

<In the event of war, Taiwan would be capable of swiftly defeating China.>

Perhaps they mean that with American support the island of Taiwan could be effectively defended. I don't think war with China over Taiwan is likely but the notion of "defeating China" is somewhat ludicrous. How exactly does one "defeat China?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 17th 2024, 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC