NY Times: Bailout Hide and Seek

[marmar]

Bailout Hide and Seek
Published: September 13, 2008



On Friday, less than a week after the government took control of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the White House announced that there is no reason at this time to account for the companies in the federal budget.

That is great news for officials who prefer to hide the cost of the bailout since it is due, in large part, to their failure to adequately regulate the financial markets and steward the economy. But it is an insult to taxpayers, whose money is at risk, and it is a reckless gambit.

The Congressional Budget Office reported on Tuesday that the government’s finances are deteriorating rapidly: the budget deficit for this year is expected to reach $407 billion, more than double last year’s shortfall, and to exceed $500 billion in 2009. The takeover of Fannie and Freddie, necessary though it is, will add to the deterioration. Airbrushing that away will only open the door to uninformed — or negligent — decisions on spending and tax cuts.

The White House says that the extent of the government’s control of Fannie and Freddie does not warrant including the companies’ operations in the budget. That is absurd. The government has seized the companies, firing their executives and installing new ones, offering to invest up to $200 billion in the companies if necessary, and most significant, making an ironclad promise to pay their trillions of dollars in obligations, if need be. .......(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/14/opinion/14sun1.html?ref=opinion

[fasttense]

1. Just like they don't account for the cost of the Iraq occupation or the borrowing of

the social security trust fund. Hide the fact that we have even more debt than is reported.

The Repiglicans have bankrupted this country and they will leave their mess for us tax payers to clean up.