Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Conservative Moral Relativism & The Ninth Commandment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 07:10 AM
Original message
Conservative Moral Relativism & The Ninth Commandment
Edited on Tue Sep-16-08 07:15 AM by Waiting For Everyman
The Huffington Post
Steven Waldman
September 15, 2008

Several conservatives have been willing to criticize McCain for his dishonest campaign ads. Rod Dreher said the McCain lipstick ad was "totally unfair, and a distortion." Senator Orrin Hatch agreed that Obama wasn't calling Palin a pig: "I'm sure he didn't mean it that way." Fox News challenged McCain's tax claims, and Steve Chapman, a conservative/libertarian columnist for the Chicago Tribune declared:

We all expect a certain amount of deceit from people running for office, in the form of fudging, distortion, exaggeration and omission. But the McCain campaign's approach, as (the "lipstick on a pig") episode illustrates, is of an entirely different scale and character. It is to normal political attacks what Hurricane Ike is to a drive-through carwash. (...)


He has charged repeatedly that his opponent is willing to lose a war to win an election. What's McCain willing to lose to become president? Nothing so consequential as a war. Just his soul.

The McCain campaign is virtually admitting it. "We're running a campaign to win. And we're not too concerned about what the media filter tries to say about it." The "media filter" -- that would be his dismissive name for fact-check articles.

John Feehery, a Republican strategist, practically bragged about the irrelevance of these fact-checking pieces. "The more The New York Times and The Washington Post go after Sarah Palin, the better off she is, because there's a bigger truth out there and the bigger truths are she's new, she's popular in Alaska and she is an insurgent. As long as those are out there, these little facts don't really matter."

The "little facts" (whether they were lying about their record or Obama's) were less important than the "bigger truths" that she's "new," "popular" and "an insurgent".

This is the moment of Conservative Moral Relativism. Hey, who's to say what's really true or false anyway? That's such a Euro-centric, patriarchical concept.

What's striking, though, is that while some conservative writers have called McCain on this, conservative religious leaders have not -- despite the words of the Ten Commandments and the widespread teaching that refusing to bear false witness is a critical part of being a good Christian. I'm not saying they should suddenly abandon McCain but isn't it part of their responsibility as moral leaders to call him on this? (Have I missed some Christian leader denunciations? If so, please link to them in the comment box below)

It looks like conservative religious leaders have embraced politics as a team sport. The Good Team has a vice presidential candidate who's a serious Christian. The Good Team will curtail abortions, so almost any tactic that can be used to save those babies is justified. Those are the bigger truths, so big, in fact, that they outweigh the Decalogue.

If the silence continues, I do at least hope that they'll stop trying to put the Ten Commandments in the courthouse and shift to something more appropriate, like a large chunk of granite engraved with, "The Ends Justify the Means".

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/steven-waldman/conservative-moral-relati_b_126673.htm

___________________________________________________________________

Thank you, Steven Waldman! Somebody finally said it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 07:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yea, and maybe the seventh as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crickets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 09:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Finally. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
misskittysister Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-16-08 10:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. Txunami of slime
Here we are, drowning in a tsunami of slime and lies while our country's economy goes belly up (we just don't know how far up). A lot of people in this country unfortunately are like the ducks in the Exxon Valdez aftermath, walking around covered in oil, saying WTF?, but not asking hard questions about how they became encrusted with muck and placed in dire peril, willing to follow anyone to lead them, as long as it's another duck, even one covered with muck. How can we wake people up in time (and time is running out!)? Thanks for sharing this spot on article. It does help to see the truth in print, but makes it all the more frustrating when TV just shows the sound byte version, which most people are devouring even though it's toxic. Glad to see that at least some in Repug circles are seeing that even by the party's own sewer standards the hypocrisy here is off the charts. But alarming and very telling that the religious right is hell bent on supporting "one of their own," no matter how full of lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Waiting For Everyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-17-08 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. In case the link is broken...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC