I promise you'll be delighted by this from David Brooks!!!!

[MISSDem]

Philosophical debates arise at the oddest times, and in the heat of this election season, one is now rising in Republican ranks. The narrow question is this: Is Sarah Palin qualified to be vice president? Most conservatives say yes, on the grounds that something that feels so good could not possibly be wrong. But a few commentators, like George Will, Charles Krauthammer, David Frum and Ross Douthat demur, suggesting in different ways that she is unready.
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/09/16/opinion/16brooks.html?_r=1&em&oref=slogin

[n2doc]

1. Except that you notice he disses Obama at the end

"Surely the response to the current crisis of authority is not to throw away standards of experience and prudence, but to select leaders who have those qualities but not the smug condescension that has so marked the reaction to the Palin nomination in the first place."

Now just who do you think he is referring to? :eyes:

[WheelWalker]

2. McCain's pick of Palin is what I think he's referring to.