Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Deregulation: A Short History

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 03:36 PM
Original message
Deregulation: A Short History

It is generally acknowledged that the lack of effective regulation of our financial intuitions, and the blind eye turned that the Bush administration turned to the excesses and wanton profiteering of that economic sector, were primary causes of the recent near meltdown. We are suffering the greatest financial crisis since 1929 when we were last dramatically reminded of the need for regulating this area.

The Great Depression marked the end of a Republican epoch in which the party had dominated the office of the presidency since before the turn of the century. In the 1920’s Republican presidents Harding, Coolidge and Hoover had famously kept the the government out of the way of business and enjoyed the benefits of an economic boom based on speculation in financial markets. The Great Depression called for the need for reforms and the institution of regulations to curb the profligacy that inevitably attends opportunity.

The Democratic Party was voted in to rein in the excesses of Wall Street and to protect the everyday person who suffered the consequences of reckless profiteering. A system of safeguards and oversight was created to assure that such catastrophe would not happen again.

In the 60 year period that followed the two Republican presidents that were elected safeguarded and contributed to the post depression-era safeguards. Eisenhower did battle to check the Pentagon’s insatiable need for money and Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency among other things.

In 1980 the pendulum began to swing back, as it has throughout our history. (Arthur M. Schlesinger wrote a great book about this called “The Cycles of American History.” These cycles usually last about 40 years, sometimes more.)

The current frenzy to deregulate dates back to the Nixon years, where talk began, although on a limited scale. Carter was a proponent of deregulating or loosening the regulation of a few industries, but Reagan made it an ideological theme. In order to do this he needed plausible support from the people whom the regulation was ultimately intended to protect. He used a variety of pumper sticker type slogans like “getting the government off our backs.” He created theatrical hypothetical villains and was celebrated for titling his lance at these windmills. He mixed this in with cutting taxes to create enough populist appeal to undertake the removal of many restrictions imposed by government. Thomas Frank explored this phenomenon in more recent years in a book called “What’s the Matter with Kansas.”

Bill Clinton carried the lust for deregulation where Reagan dared not tread. Reagan did not think that he had the political currency to attack the whole welfare system. Clinton, as a Democrat, was able to do this. Banks and investment firms had been separated since the Great Depression but Clinton oversaw the revocation of this section of the Glass Steagall Act in 1999 with his signing of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act. (That is the same Gramm who is McCain’s chief economic advisor.)

Reagan began the whole changes in the media. After several other tinkerings in 1987 Reagan abolished the Fairness Doctirne which had been a cornerstone of media regualtion. It required mdia to air bothsides of an issue if they presented one view. It was this that legalized, if you will, the Rush Limbaugh phenomenon. The Democrats were caught by suprise while right wing people raced to fill the media with their views.

It was Clinton’s signing of the Telecommunications Act on 1996 that really fueled this radicalization of the air waves by opening the doors to the monopolization of media outlets by a very few corporations. Clear Chanel began gobbling up radio stations and broadening Rush Limbaugh’s reach. Published or transmitted opinion became servant to the interests of fewer and fewer companies.

Historians will devote much attention to the similarities between the Bush administration and those of Harding, Coolidge and Hoover in the 1920’s. There was the same disregard for the oversight function of government and the same obeisance to business interests. For this crisis to occur all we needed was a captain asleep at the wheel during the late stages of the deregulation frenzy.

http://northwestlaw.wordpress.com/2008/09/20/deregulation-a-short-history/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Trajan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Clinton deserves this criticism ....
He needs to own his mistakes, and in some cases he has ....

NAFTA, Glass Steagall, and the Telecommunications Act are all examples of actions that Democrats (who supported them) should be ashamed of ...

Toss in the change in Bankruptcy laws as well ....

My party has lost it's way ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think Bankruptcy "reform" is charged to Bush, not Clinton, on the calendar.
It was one of the first things newly selected Bush did.

Your criticism of Clinton on NAFTA, Glass Steagall, and Telecommunications Act are right. Clinton also passed the technical tax change that allowed SUV's to multiply on the road -- I forget the details.

Of course, some Dems (notably including Joe Biden) voted for bankruptcy reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. John Kerry too! I was so pissed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 04:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Only in the USA is the government supposed to castrate itself to please the rich.
Why is that? Because in the USA, the government, theoretically, belongs to the people, so if it does it JOB, it will be treating the rich as ordinary citizens just like everyone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-20-08 05:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. The handwriting on the wall showed up pre. Reagan with the
Savings and Loan debacles. The GOP knew that the next step was to start the break down of regulations put into effect with FRD's reforms and it has esculatd from then on to the present day when we are seeing the results of corp/banking deregulation. Clinton clearly showed he was not an FDR democratic principles when he blithely went along with the demise of economic regulation and supported NAFTA. That is why some of us declared him a closet fiscal conservative. Clinton has his good points of course but his shining weaknss was not fighting the most important ingredient in responsible economics, well run/effective regulation of financial institutions. Of the seven deadly sins, unleashed greed is the most rampant in US economics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC