Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How Rachel Maddow Changed Network News - Editorial

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 11:45 AM
Original message
How Rachel Maddow Changed Network News - Editorial
Channel Changer

For years, liberals thought they could catch up in media by playing by conservatives' rules. Rachel Maddow's success proves it's better to just change the game.

SAM BOYD | September 24, 2008



"I think I have a fear in general about whether being a pundit is a worthwhile thing to be," Rachel Maddow tells me over dinner at a Latin restaurant in lower Manhattan. It's more than the ordinary self-deprecation of someone who just got her own cable commentary show. It's an insecurity essential to the on-air style that's powered the 35-year-old's rapid rise from a wacky morning radio show in western Massachusetts to the liberal radio network Air America and now to her own prime-time show on MSNBC.

Maddow is not a Tim Russert or a Chris Matthews--an ostensibly nonpartisan interviewer who badgers politicians and policy-makers about contradictions in their records. Nor is she a Rush Limbaugh or a Glenn Beck--an attack dog who deals in calculated anger, bluster, and outrage. She's no mild-mannered liberal like Alan Colmes or a veteran observer like Wolf Blitzer or David Gregory. Maddow has broken the broadcasting mold. She has succeeded as an avowed liberal on television precisely because she is not a liberal version of conservatives like Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck. Unlike so many progressive media figures who sought to replicate the on-air habits of the aggressive shock jocks of the right, she stumbled upon a workable style for the left. She is liberal without apology or embarrassment, bases her authority on a deep comprehension of policy rather than the culture warrior's claim to authenticity, and does it all with a light, even slightly mocking, touch. She proves that liberals can attract viewers on television when they actually act like, well, liberals.

Maddow's accidental path was paved by the success of Keith Olbermann's Countdown on MSNBC. Neither Olbermann's impressive ratings (second only to Bill O'Reilly's) nor his liberalism were foreseen by the network, which hired him in 2003 as a straight newscaster. Olbermann's audience, along with the declining popularity of Republican media outlets as the country soured on the Bush agenda, emboldened MSNBC to give Maddow her own hour of prime time, a coveted 9 P.M. slot immediately following Countdown. (The Rachel Maddow Show debuted Sept. 8.)

The announcement was interpreted by some as a turning of the tide, a sign that cable news networks were no longer a hostile environment to liberalism. But, for her part, Maddow never accepted the idea that cable executives harbor a conservative bias. As she put it, "It's sort of the first refuge of lefty scoundrels to say, 'I get the real picture, and the mainstream media would explode if they ever handled it.' But if you can make it interesting, the mainstream media is interested in it."

* * *
Maddow started her career with more interest in changing policy than in changing the media>>>>>>>snip

http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=channel_changer_08


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. She is a breath of fresh air on the TeeBee.
It's wonderful having a full hour of unabashed liberalism on a news network. I no longer feel sick when channel surfing by Glenn Beck, Hannity and O'Reilly, because we have a powerful multimedia voice now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ichingcarpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. The article gives a comprehensive background and highlights her brilliance
on her rise to where she is now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalmuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. It's a great article!
Thanks for posting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GAtomboy Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
4. Love her!!!
I think this is quite possibly my favorite show on TV
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
I Have A Dream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. I love her sweet nature and amazing intelligence. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UnrepentantUnitarian Donating Member (887 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Has anyone else had this thought?
...that Rachel may actually exceed the success that Keith has had? Through her radio show, she has developed access to a network of bloggers and others who KO has never been able to fully utilize (in his format). Just sayin' ... I love Keith, but IMHO he may not be the standard-bearer at MSNBC for much longer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cheap_Trick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. Olbermann and Maddow are the left's 1-2 punch
to the groin of the right wing media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. It's not just that she is so very bright - it's that her show
Edited on Wed Sep-24-08 12:43 PM by truedelphi
Will change the entire spectrum of the news talking shows.

No more will the women on these shows be just another pretty face.

They will have to start employing the type of OLD SCHOOL women reporters - the ones that were bright as well as pretty.

And no more discarding them the moment they hit their mid-thirties or forties.

ALready Maddow will have the Woman Gov of Missouri over someone like Brian Williams.

What a relief!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nugzie Donating Member (103 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-24-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
10. aww
I'm so glad she's doing well and gaining exposure. I <3333 her!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC