WingNOT
(669 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-09-04 09:06 AM
Original message |
Guardian speculates on Bin Laden capture |
|
In order to save time, the following article is being printed several months ahead of schedule as a service to readers and nascent conspiracy theorists.The capture of Osama bin Laden, while warmly welcomed around the world, raises several questions about the interface between the war on terror and the US election cycle. The most worrying of these is the suspicion that Mr Bin Laden had already been in custody for a considerable period. George Bush's official spokesman has vehemently denied charges that the al-Qaida leader was actually apprehended in December 2001. But there is more than a hint of a "non-denial denial" about the White House's rejection of claims that news of Mr Bin Laden's capture was timed to coincide with the climax of the Democratic party convention. It is not just die-hard cynics who found the White House spokesman Scott McClellan's "Where'd you get a crazy idea like that?" less than frank.
|
gandalf
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-09-04 09:14 AM
Response to Original message |
1. That's a really cool article! |
|
Edited on Tue Mar-09-04 09:16 AM by gandalf
I liked that one: "...but the idea that US special forces capturing Mr Bin Laden also found George Bush's missing national guard records in a Tora Bora cave is simply too much to swallow."
But the reality it ridicules is quite sad.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sun May 05th 2024, 06:55 AM
Response to Original message |