Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No Rest For the Weary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Daveparts Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 09:29 AM
Original message
No Rest For the Weary
No Rest For the Weary
By David Glenn Cox


In quiet, muted tones they spoke; with split screens and double split screens they poured out information in a thinly veiled attempt to mute the message. Britt Hume looked over his glasses and down his nose and spoke to Faux America like a funeral director. “Obama has won the Presidency, but what is important now is, will the Democrats win a filibuster-proof majority in the US Senate?”

That is the question Faux News thinks is important, but in that other America, with its millions of Joe the plumbers, they celebrated a seminal moment in American history. An estimated 200 thousand people filled Chicago’s Grant Park, a park that was once a famous American political battleground. It was transformed for this one night into the promised land.

In New York and in Atlanta, throughout millions of homes in this country, there was a public rejoicing, unlike any rejoicing I’ve ever seen in my lifetime. But on Faux all that was missing was black bunting and caissons. In the parks and at the celebrations women, along with men, wept. African Americans were joyous celebrating an event that many once thought was impossible. Congressman John Lewis was almost speechless when asked of his feelings of the event. “We never dreamed of it when we sat in at lunch counters.”

“In a race Faux News has determined to be too close to call, Congressman Jack Murtha has declared himself the winner,” Hume said. Thirty minutes later Murtha’s vote total had swelled and Faux was forced to admit defeat/victory. It was a hard night to be a propagandist; the roof had fallen in. Despite round the clock negative news stories and verbose pontifications by Rove and Huckabee and O’Reilly and Hannity, and even just plain Joe, the dam had burst and the pipes had broken and there was much work for the plumber. A propaganda organization can only work best when focused on a single front. It is like a hammer that drives at a single nail and cannot multitask.

The vote was a repudiation of George W. Bush, a repudiation of conservative Republicanism, and a repudiation of John Sidney McCain and his sucker mom, caribou Barbie. On Faux News it was reported that John McCain was incredibly gracious in his concession speech. Glossed over and lost in the moment was what John Sidney McCain did and did not say. Each time John McCain mentioned the names of Barack Obama or Joe Biden the faithful would boo loudly and McCain would throw his arms up to quiet them.

His arms said quiet but his lips said continue by their silence. I kept waiting for him to say, "The campaign is over, the election is now decided, we have a new President elect. We must as Americans rally behind him and support him." And he did say that at the end of his speech. Maybe that’s too wordy, maybe he could have crystallized it into a phrase or a slogan. I know, how about "country first?" Instead McCain chose to take the blame all on himself, despite a badly run and badly managed campaign he threw himself on his sword. Then, in a mavericky sort of quirky contradiction, McCain then called his running mate a wonderful candidate.

You see, it was all about McCain. The loss was his loss and his choice for a running mate cannot be questioned because she was his choice. He was both accepting and denying responsibility, “This is an historic election,” he said, “and I recognize the special significance it has for African Americans and for the special pride that must be theirs tonight. I've always believed that America offers opportunities to all who have the industry and will to seize it. Senator Obama believes that, too.”

Incredible hubris from an incredibly self-centered man, the gracious thing to do is admit defeat and call for unity and go away. Instead McCain chose to take the blame and then implied that his loss was due to African Americans. Out of the ether and imagination this mist becomes a cloud and a cloud becomes a perception and the perception becomes the new mantra. Obama carried the white vote, the black vote, and the Hispanic vote at a much higher rate than did John Kerry. John McCain's loss in this election was not due to African American's vote but due to America’s vote. To praise with his left hand and imply with his right is a vindication that America did indeed choose the right man.

In an honest mirror McCain could see that it was white men and white women that lost him this election. That white man George Bush lost him this election, Bill O’Reilly lost him this election. Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh lost him this election, and even Joe the plumber lost him this election. America is sick and tired of the name calling and the scapegoating, and sick of the race baiting. Sick and tired of scandals and the leaks, of prerogative and of privilege of communist, socialist, plumber and king.

In the real America people are hurting. McCain campaigned relentlessly that Obama will raise your taxes while millions lost their jobs. Like telling the blind that Obama will take away your reading lamps and it is telling just how far out of step John McCain is from the real America. Obama campaigned that McCain was a continuation of the Bush presidency and at the eleventh hour the McCain camp proved it so by running the Rev. Wright ads in swing states. America voted for change, they voted convincingly for change; blacks, whites, gay, straight, Christians, and Jews voted for change.

In Faux America the questions have already begun, “Will Obama govern from the center as he promises? Or will he govern from the left as his record implies?” You remember his record don’t you? The one that Faux News said on Monday that he didn’t have in the first place? “Who will he name to his cabinet?” No rest for the weary, not even one day off; the propaganda mill runs non-stop. Christ, even QVC turns it off for Christmas day. But not Faux or McCain or the Republicans, there are stories to weave and narratives to sell.

"If a man loses pace with his companions, perhaps it is because he hears a different drummer.” Or perhaps he’s just a Republican and watching too much Faux News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
1. Very perceptive. This seems to me the key point in a first-rate article:
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 11:00 AM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
"In an honest mirror McCain could see that it was white men and white women that lost him this election. That white man George Bush lost him this election, Bill O’Reilly lost him this election. Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh lost him this election, and even Joe the plumber lost him this election. America is sick and tired of the name calling and the scapegoating, and sick of the race baiting. Sick and tired of scandals and the leaks, of prerogative and of privilege of communist, socialist, plumber and king."

I'm looking at some strange figures in today's Daily Mail, evidently well out of kilter in that they will reflect the truth after the worst of the election fraud and voter suppression had wrought its villainy, but STILL sometimes very telling, despite the bias:

53% of those earning $50,000 or more voted for OBAMA, even in the knowledge that they would be taxed more highly on their income. Not every monied person sees everything through a prism of materialism and greed, and voting for an elderly man, intent on pursuing Bush's ruinous policies, and who had chosen as his VP a woman who doesn't know that Africa is a continent, would simply not have been an option. Nevertheless, imo, even this would have been a significant understatement of the actual figure of the pro-Obama monied people.

Another figure reported was 49% of men voting pro Obama. To me, that is an extension of one of their choicest "big lies": that the military favour the Republicans - and strongly. While more officers might vote for the Republicans than enlisted men, I'd be surprised if even a small majority of them voted Republican this time, but rather, the contrary. And enlisted men many fewer still.

There is no way I would be persuaded that 49% of American males are that "thick"; not in a million years. It looks to me that that election was actually a much, much larger landslide victory for the Democrats than the fraud and suppression of the Republican malefactors have allowed.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
2. And a nice turn of phrase:
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 11:18 AM by bemildred
"A propaganda organization can only work best when focused on a single front. It is like a hammer that drives at a single nail and cannot multitask."

A useful insight, and well put. Let me second Mr Dulles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. You rotter! Couldn't you have chosen Marx?
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 03:47 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Daveparts Donating Member (854 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Groucho ?
Chico ? Harpo? Zeppo?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I did write K, Davy lad. Don Carlo Marxissimo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Gripe, gripe, gripe, I didn't choose "III" did I?
Why didn't you just make up your mind anyway? Leaving it for others to sort out as usual, no doubt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 05:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I didn't think Cabot and Dulles would be too happy, sandwiched between Karl and Marx, Bemitched
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 05:19 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
Bothered and BeMildred, though I may be maligning the Cabots, somewhat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. "Bemitched"?
You may have discovered a new insult and/or dirty word.
:rofl:

The Cabots, I would think, were less degraded than Dulles, so yeah.

I don't expect Marx would be all that happy about have "CabotDulles" inserted there either.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I don't expect Marx would be all that happy about have "CabotDulles" inserted there either.
Touche, BBB (sounds even more like swear words!).

I'm ashamed I didn't think of that, myself. Very insensitive.

Re the Cabots, from what I've gathered, "old money", "toff" families tend to have a fair smattering of eccentrics and decent coves and lassies, don't they? They tend to be more like working-class than middle-class folk.

I was intrigued to read a while back the "take" on Oscar the hospice cat of a woman with the surname Cabot, concerning his intuition of a person's approaching death. She believed Oscar was tuned into the Alpha waves of the person concerned. I think so, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Almost all of what passes for progressive politics and economics originated
Edited on Thu Nov-06-08 08:53 PM by bemildred
in various be-knighted members of the bourgeois and ruling classes, and most or the leaders of popular movements have the same sorts of origin, though there are a few exceptions. And if we ever do attain the nirvana of equality and justice, we will have to include the descendants or the rich in the resulting polity, almost by definition. Any real utopia cannot be about revenge.

Marx himself was bourgeois or upper class in origin, so were Che and Castro and Lenin, and Gandhi, and a lot of the hippies in the 60s, class-traitors all of them.

It has always seemed folly to me to expect to achieve utopia by liquidating the current ruling elites. You just get new ruling elites that way, usually worse ones. You have to let everybody in, and the old guard is likely to tolerate the change better if they are treated decently.

I just think cats pay better attention to how people really look, it's not polite if you're human. "Oh, I say, you look like you might be dying soon." is tacky to say or think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morpheal Donating Member (145 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-06-08 10:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. The Weary
And keep in mind that more than half the world does not agree with the blind faith
religion of American capitalism. A rational, scientific, economics, is built and
regulated to serve the good of the people. When you need to change the rules, you
change them in a rational way, using scientific principles. You do not simply put
forward a belief that all will be well in the end.

It is time for change.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 12:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC