Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I’ll Take Racism By Republicans for $1000, Alex

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Stingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:41 PM
Original message
I’ll Take Racism By Republicans for $1000, Alex
Post-racial society? Is that what we have here after the election of Barack Obama? Not so we’d notice, judging by all the racist incidents reported across the country. The Secret Service is going to have to pay a whole lot of visits, and the Republican Pundits Gone Wild might be asked by saner members of the GOP to tone it down.

http://allspinzone.com/wp/2008/11/12/ill-take-racism-by-republicans-for-1000-alex/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. There are nations where racist speech is a crime
I am not advocating that we have such a law here.

But these people should be reminded that they are abusing the freedom of speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Would that work?
I don't think so. But if the RNC were to have quiet talks with Limbaugh and Hannity and Coulter and the like, and to all of their dwindling corps of elected officials, that might do some good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. I'd Be Willing to Give It a Try
For one thing, Fox News would go out of business, the GOP pundits would be literally speechless, and Rupert Murdoch would go bankrupt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-13-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. And there's a negative here?
Please point that out for me. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. "saner members of the GOP" - where? That species does not exist. The backlash is and will be
far greater than any feared.

Any weakness (conciliation) shown by the administration will only encourage the pukes.

They must be crushed beyond any ability to come back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I will admit
Nobody has proven, as yet, that such a species still exists. Certainly the few who seem sane, such as Lugar, are not very strong voices in the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. And I do not want them to tone down their rhetoric. Let them speak "their" truth and let
America hear them and know them for the scum they are. They have lied themselves into an image as reasonable and only different than Democrats. If the country learns who and what they really are, I have to believe that enough Americans will reject them. If the country would accept the GOP as it truly is, I would have no hope (or desire) to save this country.

Only by exposing evil can it be confronted and destroyed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Oh, their rhetoric explains
the poll numbers, no doubt about that. Heck, they're not going to take my advice anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nurgel Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hanging a flag upside down isn't racist,
it signals a vessel (or in this case, our country) in distress and in need of rescue. Vanity Fair would do well to do a little more research in the future. Yes, it can be inferred that those doing it had racist intentions, but its possible they simply wanted a Republican to win and not a Democrat.

http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20071104224321AA6JOBz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stingo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I've no problem
assuming the person was a racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nurgel Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Indeed
I wouldn't be suprised it they were either. Doesn't change the fact that Vanity Fair is incorrect for reporting it as racism though. :|
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-12-08 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
10. Barack was elected despite his race.
Edited on Wed Nov-12-08 07:46 PM by hay rick
He was elected because the Republicans couldn't get away from the catastrophic legacy of GWB.

He was elected because he was calm, eloquent, and professional and McCain was not.

He was elected because the economy tanked while McCain was clinging to Republican free market/deregulation principles that were being exposed as blather.

He was elected because McCain chose Palin for VP- a folly which demonstrated McCain's impulsiveness and undermined the central argument of his campaign- that his experience gave him the virtue of superior judgment.

America's racial problems are alive and well. Barack's election is a baby step in a better direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC