Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dave Lindorff: Barack's First Big Mistake on the Job: Rescuing Joe Lieberman

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:29 AM
Original message
Dave Lindorff: Barack's First Big Mistake on the Job: Rescuing Joe Lieberman
http://www.buzzflash.com/articles/lindorff/169

The word is that Barack Obama, in keeping with his promise of a new post-Bush/Cheney era of "civility in government," is telling Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid not to eject the treacherous Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) from the Democratic caucus.

This is a terrible mistake. Joe Lieberman is a wretched example of a man without principle -- a back-stabbing slimeball of a politician whose only allegiance, apparently, besides to himself, is to Israel.

Now I don't want anyone to think I'm some rabid anti-Semite. My wife and kids are Jewish, we have good friends who are Israeli, and no, I don't think the Jews run the media or the country. I do, however, think that Joe Lieberman thinks more about what, in his warped and shriveled worldview, is good for Israel than about what is good for America.

This senator from my childhood state of Connecticut, who back in 2000 ran as a standard-bearer of the Democratic Party as Al Gore's running mate, since 9-11 has been a warmonger of the first order, even joining the right-wing Sen. Jon Kyl (R-AZ) in trying to pass a resolution in the Senate last year that, had it made it through as he originally worded it, would have effectively enabled -- even invited -- George Bush to attack Iran at will as a part of Bush's megalomaniacal global "War" on Terror.

It is Lieberman's obsession with having the U.S. obliterate first Iraq and now Iran, with nukes if need be, that led him to abandon his party and become a leading supporter and apologist for George W. Bush and Dick Cheney, and later to become a key endorser of Sen. John "Bomb-bomb-bomb-bomb-Iran" McCain.

Lieberman also signed on enthusiastically to the worst excesses of Bush's and Cheney's eight-year-long assault on the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, and international law. As head of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, Lieberman became the leading advocate of fascist policies in the Senate, rivaled only by such ranting Republican proto-fascists as Sen. Pat Roberts (R-KS) and Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN). It was Lieberman who at least initially enthusiastically backed Attorney General John Ashcroft's mad proposal (thankfully never implemented) to establish an Operation TIPS (for Terrorist Information and Prevention Service) program that would have recruited millions of Americans to spy on their neighbors and co-workers, replicating the dreaded Stasi of Communist East Germany. Only after libertarian-minded Republicans such as former House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-TX) came out strongly against the scheme did Lieberman have second thoughts. Initially, in fact, Lieberman had personally, in his role as chair, blocked efforts by Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-VT) to delete funding for Operation TIPS from a Homeland Security Department funding bill before his committee.

The Democrats, who already are assured of 56 solid seats in their caucus in the next Senate, with a chance at a couple more when all the 2004 Election races are settled and runoffs completed, don't need a weasel such as Lieberman mucking up their ranks. If they need four more votes to kill some Republican filibusters, they have Republicans they can turn to, or cajole. If Barack Obama is smart (and he certainly is that), he can also add a few -- perhaps even four -- Democrats to Senate ranks by naming as many Republican senators as he needs to replace to cabinet posts. As long as he names people such as Sens. Susan Collins or Olympia Snowe of Maine, or Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, who represent states with Democratic governors, those governors will be able to appoint, as replacements, Democratic senators.

The other reason to shun Lieberman, and to cast him into the legislative purgatory he so richly deserves, is that it would be an object lesson to other potential Iagos in the party's legislative ranks that such treachery will not be tolerated. What, after all, is the point of having a party at all, if its members can be as back-stabbing as Lieberman and get away with it?

It would be a good lesson to the Democrats of the state of Connecticut, too, who voted in a Democratic primary two years ago to oust Lieberman as their candidate for re-election, but who then turned around and joined Republicans in re-electing him when he ran as an independent against a Republican challenger and against Ned Lamont, the Democrat who had bested him in the primary. This was treachery by a class of Democrats in the state of Connecticut that should also not go unpunished. Connecticut voters should no longer have the benefit of a powerful senator with seniority when that senator has so betrayed his party.

Let Lieberman go over to the Republicans hat in hand. Let him squirm as the Christian fundamentalists among them talk in tongues and as others of them mutter their anti-Semitic obscenities behind his back. Let this one-time self-described advocate of civil rights blush in shame as his new colleagues crack their racist jokes about the new president in the lily-white Republican caucus room.

Don't get me wrong. I believe in redemption as much as the next atheist. I'd be perfectly happy to see Joey Lieberman back in the Democratic caucus, but first he should be made to make a full public apology both to Obama and to the millions of Democrats who elected the nation's first black president, as well as to the Democrats of his home state of Connecticut, whose resounding 61%-38% vote for Obama was the biggest repudiation of Lieberman of all. That 38 percent tally is the one he should have had when he ran for re-election last time. It's probably higher than he'd get if he ran today in Connecticut against Lamont or any other Democrat.

DAVE LINDORFF is a Philadelphia-based journalist and columnist. His latest book is "The Case for Impeachment" (St. Martin's Press, 2006). His work is available at www.thiscantbehappening.net.

WHILE I HAVE NO QUARREL WITH LINDORFF'S ARGUMENT, I THINK OBAMA MAY HAVE A MUCH WORSE FATE IN STORE FOR LIEBERMAN, WHICH WILL BE DELIVERED OUTSIDE THE GLARE OF PUBLICITY, AND WILL CRUSH JOE FOREVER. I AM WILLING TO WAIT AND SEE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. "The word is..." - no sources, no names = BS nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. I have a quarrel with Lindorff. He does this for a living so I 'get' it.
He has to write about something. But he doesn't have a clue either. That goes for a lot of people who are into speculating; I wonder how their 401k's are looking? :spray:
I'm with you, Demeter. I'm just going to wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Seems like he's right on target to me. Despite two consecutive smashing wins
(provided by the revival of the progessive base of the party) Dems in DC are still stuck in the right-leaning conventional wisdom of the Beltway. The only place Joe Lieberman is popular is with the DC press corps and the conservative "opinon leaders" in Washington, yet Democrats are afraid of being called vindictive or "liberal" or intolerant if they boot this guy out. Reid should have dealt with this guy swiftly and brutally last week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I contend that no one has been rescued yet.
Obama won't take Lieberman's calls

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=132&topic_id=7868727


We don't know what is up anyone's sleeve concerning Lieberman. If he is stripped of his chairs and made to sit in a corner, that's okay by me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 11:52 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Thank You! It seems yet again a myth has taken over as reality
Somebody said that Obama intervened for Joe the Asshole. Nope, not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Music Donating Member (349 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 01:10 PM
Response to Original message
6. Is the party waiting for the undecided Senate races to deal with Lieberman?
I hear that there are at least 3 up for grabs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-15-08 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Last I Heard, They Were Waiting for Lieberman's Response to Reid's Ultimatum
Edited on Sat Nov-15-08 03:28 PM by Demeter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spectral Music Donating Member (349 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-16-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Have we heard anything? NT
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC