Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Depression 2009: What would it look like?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 12:55 PM
Original message
Depression 2009: What would it look like?
more: http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/ideas/articles/2008/11/16/depression_2009_what_would_it_look_like/?page=full

By Drake Bennett
November 16, 2008

OVER THE PAST few months, Americans have been hearing the word "depression" with unfamiliar and alarming regularity. The financial crisis tearing through Wall Street is routinely described as the worst since the Great Depression, and the recession into which we are sinking looks deep enough, financial commentators warn, that a few poor policy decisions could put us in a depression of our own.

It's a frightening possibility, but also in many ways an abstraction. The country has gone so long without a depression that it's hard to know what it would be like to live through one.

Most of us, of course, think we know what a depression looks like. Open a history book and the images will be familiar: mobs at banks and lines at soup kitchens, stockbrokers in suits selling apples on the street, families piled with all their belongings into jalopies. Families scrimp on coffee and flour and sugar, rinsing off tinfoil to reuse it and re-mending their pants and dresses. A desperate government mobilizes legions of the unemployed to build bridges and airports, to blaze trails in national forests, to put on traveling plays and paint social-realist murals.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. It will look like Sec Daschle sitting on his ass wringing his hands because
he has no f***ing courage to fight for the homeless and hungry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. agree with that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
natrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. that guy is such a fucking pussy, what a bummer of an appointment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benld74 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. WILL NOT be pretty
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. One of the contributing factor that was present in the 1930's and is not
present now is the complete and utter destruction of farm land in Northern Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and parts of Colorado. The land was over worked and not replenished and when the winds started to blow hard, the topsoil turned to dust and blew away...

There were food shortages because of this confluence of really bad circumstance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Contributing factors that were not present in the 1930s and are now:
From my article Gathering Momentum:

Then there is the perennial (and perennially optimistic) reference to the WPA during the Great Depression. Millions of people were put to work on infrastructure projects, and were happy to find the work, no matter what it paid. Of course labour costs will drop through the floor in any deflationary depression, but there's more to a recovery than just the cost of labour. The problem I find with comparisons to Depression-era WPA efforts lies in these facts:

* The American manufacturing base has been significantly eroded compared to 1930;
* Energy and raw material prices are much higher than they were then (oil is over 5 times more expensive in constant dollars);
* The population of the USA is almost 3 times higher;
* The per capita national debt is 6 times higher in constant dollars;
* The national debt has ballooned from 20% of GDP in 1930 to 100% today;
* The USA now imports 2/3 of its oil, compared to 0 then. This is especially significant in light of the Export Land Model proposed by Jeffrey Brown of The Oil Drum, which leads to the conclusion that the international oil market could go completely dry within 25 years.
* The derivatives market -- whose value depends strictly on agreements between buyers and sellers that can vanish in an instant -- is nominally valued at ten times the world's total GDP. The disappearance of this value in a global mark-to-market event could be the trigger for a world-wide deflationary crash.

All these factors create a physical and economic environment with "significantly" more challenges than the USA faced in 1930.

My best guess right now is that the world will, overall, reset within ten years to a level of economic activity that is less than half of today's value, and that this will become the new normal. Recovery to our current level of activity will not be possible due to the convergence of permanent ecological and energy shortfalls. Some regions may do better than that, some worse. The USA is primed to be fall into the "worse" column because of its dependence on imported oil and its eroded manufacturing base, neither of which can be rectified in the time remaining with the money remaining.

Given the current circumstances a recovery from this crisis is not guaranteed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. great-thanks for posting this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I'd like to add
That in 1930 there was still significant part of the population working in basic production (farmers etc.). Today only very small part, and even those totally dependent on energy intensive industrial farming. Except Amish and few ecovillages.

In 1930 many still had basic skills. Today most have only useless skills.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. yes, i've thought about that alot - should start some basic
instruction on candle making, gardening, sewing, & i am sure many other things
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. Thanks for posting this
It's a subtle way of showing how we basically are in a depression already...but that's hardly a surprise to those feeling the squeeze.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. yes, hardly a surprise-whole families on the street
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. The sad part about that
That particular problem has been going on for years...but no concern until the problem became more widespread(as to threaten some of the better off).

Ironically, I used to advocate against homelessness and poverty...until the threat of such in my own life required me to set that aside and fight for myself and my disabled relative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. yes, true - it has
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vinylsolution Donating Member (807 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
9. President Obama must....
... find a place for John Edwards in his administration.

One guy we KNOW who will fight for the homeless and the hungry (unlike dumb-ass Daschle).

Fighting the Bush Depression on behalf of blue-collar folks would be a great way for Edwards to restore his reputation.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trojan Donating Member (860 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 09:52 PM
Response to Original message
15. Let Me Point Out One Difference Between 1933 And 2008
75 Years ago... Now there are many many more rich folks than poor ones. Then there was no internet. No one really understood what really happened.

Now when things get BAD and sadly it will, the Crooks and Cons (Fed and Wall Street) still are Well Off ...

Anger mounts ... Then what ? Look at the Pirates in Somalia ! The Evil of Money !!! What a Sodam and Gomorah world !!! Go Britney Spears

Do Not give the peasants CAKE ! Feed them American Idol while we debase the US Dollar. Some thoughts from a Canadian that Loves America and does not care for the EVIL FED and the Bankers. Go Back to your constitution ! The FED is not part of what your founding Fathers wanted with GOOD REASON !

They passed that LAW December 23, 1913 in the middle of the night and STOLE America !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hyperdemocrat Donating Member (13 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-19-08 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't even want to think about it
The thought depresses me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC