Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thinking Ahead on Electoral Reform

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Wilms Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-27-08 05:56 AM
Original message
Thinking Ahead on Electoral Reform

Thinking Ahead on Electoral Reform

By Jim Gomes

November 24, 2008

~snip~

We should not delude ourselves that the post-election warfare of 2000 and the suspicions of 2004 are behind us. This year, pre-election polls consistently showed Obama comfortably ahead in most of the erstwhile battleground states. The lack of voter challenges, lawsuits, and so on was due in large part to both sides expecting that the result wasn't going to be close. If polls had indicated a tighter race, we probably would have witnessed more contention and more problems.

~snip~

More serious and troubling are wholesale methods of stealing elections. These include election officials stuffing piles of pre-marked ballots into the boxes, or making ballots from an opponent's geographic base disappear. Or programming election machines to undercount opposing votes or overcount yours. Get convicted of this and you will go to jail too, although the potential competitive benefit is higher than retail vote fraud, and fewer people need to be in on the conspiracy.

Best of all, for those with electoral larceny in their hearts, is voter suppression. Order too few voting machines for polling places in your opponent's strongholds and create long lines that discourage voters. Delete from voter rolls names that resemble those of convicts. Bloodless, bureaucratic, and effective: Thousands of demographically inconvenient voters are disenfranchised. It's also harder to be prosecuted for this.

Criminal activity is not the only cause of electoral mishap and may not be the most significant. Innocent machine malfunctions can also cause votes not to be recorded, or register votes that were never cast.

~snip~

We should resist proposals to allow voting over the Internet. While Internet voting could boost turnout, it would also increase the possibility for tampering or malfunction and make sorting out what happened impossible.

~snip~

Jim Gomes, a guest columnist, is director of the Mosakowski Institute for Public Enterprise at Clark University.

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/11/24/thinking_ahead_on_electoral_reform/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC