Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Framing Illegal Immigration

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Chipster Donating Member (139 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 02:54 PM
Original message
Framing Illegal Immigration
To me, the topic of illegal immigration involves how the issue is framed. Is the issue framed in terms of "human rights" or "rule of law?"

If the issue of illegal immigration is framed in the broad general term of "human rights," then how does it not also endorse anarchy?

No doubt all aliens are human, and humans break laws.

Defining the issue in terms of "human rights" ignores a fundamental issue: "Who benefits?"

As workers, these people are exploited for profit by corporations and other employers who pay them substandard wages, without benefits, sometimes in cash, avoiding taxation. In advocating for ending workplace enforcement of federal immigration laws, human rights advocates also unwittingly advocate for continued worker exploitation and support the 9th characteristic of fascism, Corporate Power is Protected: The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders into power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

Advocates of "human rights" for illegal aliens place those "rights" above the legal citizens' rights to live in a lawful civil society, often employing accusations of xenophobia. Those accusations only ignore or cloud the myriad of issues involved with illegal immigration by lumping together any pragmatic issues under the disparaging umbrella of "racism" and "xenophobia."

Some of the pragmatic issues involved include:


to name a few.

That linguistic framing of the issue as critical to obscuring the pragmatic issues is evidenced by a recent enigmatic event when it initially was reported that the Arizona Supreme Court banned numerous immigration-related phrases, including “illegal alien” and “open-borders advocates” only to have that recanted in an update.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-28-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. Nice post, Karl!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC