Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

One tax, two tax. Sin tax, poor tax.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Jaundice James Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 12:42 PM
Original message
One tax, two tax. Sin tax, poor tax.
I’m super-duper happy that millions of children will now have health insurance that wouldn’t have otherwise. The intention for the new SCHIP bill couldn’t have been better or the recipients more deserving...

...all those Bush tax cuts for the rich are still on the books. You remember those don’t you? After Bush campaigned in 2000 on “the dignity of the White House” and was oh-ever-so-humble on the campaign trail...

...Cigarette taxes disproportionately affect the poor. This is true for a number or reasons...

http://www.examiner.com/x-1470-DC-Progressive-Examiner~y2009m2d4-One-tax-two-tax-Sin-tax-poor-tax-SCHIP-cig-facts




.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Obama severely dissapointed me by signing this bill into law
It violated every tenant of his campaign that highlighted how the middle and lower classes have been getting screwed over with taxes while the well off were getting all the breaks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
catnhatnh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. If you want to see screwed see this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venceremos Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
3. Tobacco tax revenues are a declining and unstable revenue source.
Tobacco sales already decline 2 – 4% a year, and will decline faster because of the massive tax increases. But health care costs are rising 8 – 10% a year, so SCHIP cannot be properly funded through tobacco taxes.

Either millions more people need to start smoking, or existing smokers need to smoke a lot more to prevent SCHIP from having devastating budget shortfalls.

http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/11761436.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hello_Kitty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's what worries me about this
Eventually the existing smokers are going to be tapped out. Then they will either have to find another "sin" to tax (junk food?) or create new smokers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venceremos Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Or they could spread the tax evenly on everyone
That seems the fairest way to do it. Plus when you spread it out it's MUCH cheaper for the average taxpayer to bear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jaundice James Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Seriously...
As if tobacco were the only thing that's bad for you. Tax soda pop.

Actually, they should just tax the profits of insurance companies. They're the ones profiting from all the healthcare problems anyway.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venceremos Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Good idea
Don't know if it's true, but I've read that the big tobacco companies, such as RJ Reynolds, lobbied politicians for the SCHIP tax increases on roll-your-own, cigars, etc. Their theory is more people will buy their smokes now because nothing else is cheaper anymore.

So if true, big tobacco wins and everyone else loses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jaundice James Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I can see...
I can see them lobbying to tax roll-your-own, but cigars? Nobody switches from cigars to cigarettes.

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venceremos Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. small cigars
sorry, meant small cigars, the little cigarellos that come in various flavors. They're apparently popular among younger smokers, because they think they look cool. "People are using them as a cheaper alternative to cigarettes," says Nik Modi, a tobacco industry analyst at UBS, a securities firm.

Source: http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2008-02-19-small-cigars_N.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jaundice James Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Oh, yeah...
You're right. I smoke those myself when I'm drinking as an alternative to cigarettes, now that you mention it.
I don't know about a CHEAPER alternative. I don't know who told them cigarellos were cheaper? They're about $11 for a tin of 20 for about a mid-quality cigarello. Now, they're going to be even more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Venceremos Donating Member (488 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. They're cheaper here
I smoked them for a little while, but couldn't handle the taste. Here they cost less - two packs of cigarellos is the same price as one pack of cigs. Oh, and I like your blog. Unfortunately, the cigar shop in Denver you profiled will probably go out of business under the weight of this tax.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jaundice James Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yeah...
The good shops will suffer. The bad ones are charging such inflated prices they should just absorb the tax, or you won't notice it in their jacked up prices. I live in DC now. I haven't figured out what to do with the Cigars in Denver blog yet. -JJ

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-05-09 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. Why don't we have a superstition tax?
Charge churches, and certain other "non-profits" property taxes for the taxpayer funded services they use.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jaundice James Donating Member (248 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-06-09 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Tax bibles. That'll generate revenue. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC