Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The new Fallujah up close and ugly

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:18 AM
Original message
The new Fallujah up close and ugly
Edited on Fri Feb-13-09 09:19 AM by bemildred
FALLUJAH - Driving through Fallujah, once the most rebellious Sunni city in Iraq, I saw little evidence of any kind of reconstruction underway. At least 70% of that city's structures were destroyed during massive US military assaults in April, and again in November 2004, and more than four years later, in the "new Iraq", the city continues to languish.

The shells of buildings pulverized by US bombs, artillery or mortar fire back then still line Fallujah's main street, or rather, what's left of it. As one of the few visible signs of reconstruction in the city, that street - largely destroyed during the November 2004 siege - is slowly being torn up to be repaved.

Unemployment is rampant, the infrastructure remains largely in ruins, and tens of thousands of residents who fled in 2004 are still refugees. How could it be otherwise, given the amount of effort that went into its destruction and not, subsequently, into rebuilding it? It's a place where a resident must still carry around a US-issued personal biometric ID card, which must also be shown any time you enter or exit the city if you are local. Such a card can only be obtained after US military personnel have scanned your retinas and taken your fingerprints.

The trauma from the 2004 attacks remains visible everywhere. Given the countless still-bullet-pocked walls of restaurants, stores and homes, it is impossible to view the city from any vantage point, or look in any direction, without observing signs of those sieges.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/KB14Ak01.html

Edit: And, all this cost boatloads of our tax money, not to mention dead soldiers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
1. War sometimes is the setting to experiment on all kinds of tech.
that most civil communities would not allow."It's a place where a resident must still carry around a US-issued personal biometric ID card, which must also be shown any time you enter or exit the city if you are local. Such a card can only be obtained after US military personnel have scanned your retinas and taken your fingerprints." Is this from I'll put a chip in me-Thommy Thomson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
2. So why in the hell isn't the Iraqi government
using that $79 billion oil surplus money to put people to work rebuilding? This seems like such a no-brainer to me. There is so much rebuilding to be done, they could employ hundreds of thousands, maybe more than a million, on construction crews. Obviously Iraq remains a dysfunctional country, but with the money in hand and incredible unemployment to deal with, you would think they would have moved toward a solution like this already.

Security is certainly a tremendous challenge, but they could employ a lot of police and other security related people. I don't see the problem as unsolvable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. i didn't know there was an Iraqi government. You mean we aren't thier government?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Still Sensible Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:12 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's a good question, too.
lol.... Well if we are, the same question applies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-13-09 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I thought Kucinich had the best plan by far as concerns Iraq. Trouble is, we sure broke it, but we
aren't all that hot about paying to fix it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC