Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Buildup of US Troops in Afghanistan May Be Just the Start

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:07 PM
Original message
Buildup of US Troops in Afghanistan May Be Just the Start
Published on Thursday, February 19, 2009 by the Chicago Tribune
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/02/19-7


Buildup of US Troops in Afghanistan May Be Just the Start

U.S. general says more soldiers may be need, sees commitment lasting 3 to 5 more years

by Julian E. Barnes


WASHINGTON - A day after President Barack Obama ordered additional troops to Afghanistan, the top U.S. commander there said he may need still more troops in coming months to bolster an intensified war effort that could last as long as five additional years.

US soldiers in Khost province in 2008. A day after President Barack Obama ordered additional troops to Afghanistan, the top U.S. commander there said he may need still more troops in coming months to bolster an intensified war effort that could last as long as five additional years. (AFP/File/David Furst)Gen. David McKiernan plans to use the 17,000 additional soldiers and Marines being sent by Obama to try to break an impasse in fighting with the Taliban in the southern part of the country.

"What this allows us to do is change the dynamics of the security situation, predominantly in southern Afghanistan, where we are at best stalemated," McKiernan said.

The new deployments, raising the overall U.S. troop level to about 55,000, will fulfill military needs through Afghanistan's Aug. 20 presidential election, McKiernan said. But he held open the possibility of additional troop requests.

McKiernan said that last year, he had forecast the need for an additional 30,000 troops for 2009 and beyond. The deployment of 17,000 troops ordered Tuesday, combined with the earlier assignment of about an Army brigade of 3,500 from the 10th Mountain Division, provides two-thirds of the forecast need, he said.

The remaining number, about 10,000, could be sought later this year or next year if military reviews indicate the need for them, McKiernan said.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates said Wednesday that the administration would not consider further troop requests until after completion of a strategy review in April. Gates, who is traveling to a NATO meeting in Poland, also said he plans to press allies this week to follow the U.S. example and do more in Afghanistan.

McKiernan acknowledged limits to how many foreign forces the Afghan people would tolerate. But he said the troops could help stabilize the country while local and international officials work on governance, economic development and security force increases.

"I would like to reinforce what the president has said, that this is not going to be won by military forces alone," McKiernan said.

He also cautioned that the additional forces do not represent a troop surge but an intensified war effort that may last for years.

"This is not a temporary force uplift. It's going to need to be sustained for some period of time," he said, defining the period as "the next three to four or five years."

He described the extremist insurgency as resilient and said the U.S. and its allies do not have enough forces in the southern part of the country, the stronghold of the Taliban.

McKiernan said U.S. commanders also remain troubled by extremists in sanctuaries along the Afghan-Pakistan border and expressed concern about this week's cease-fire between Islamabad and militants in Pakistan's Swat Valley, about 100 miles from the nation's capital.

"We're going to watch this very carefully and see how that does affect the insurgency on the Afghan side of the border," McKiernan said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. We are not given numbers of private contractors.
I don't think they are included in these troop numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heftheplayboy Donating Member (14 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm with a surge in Afghanistan. Iraq is another story
Two different scenarios. Iraq was a war conceived through lies. Afghanistan harbors the Taliban who realy cooperated in 9-11. I'm with Obama's surge here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'm sure we'll have a much better time fighting them than Russia did.
Live and don't learn, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
balantz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
4. Sick war profiteers. Sick killing of innocents. Sick lies of "war on terror".n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
classysassy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-19-09 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. How do you define stupidity?
Wasn't this done before by the Russians?,sometime history teaches us nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC