Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Seven Intellectual Underpinnings of the Obama Code: George Lakoff

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 01:45 PM
Original message
The Seven Intellectual Underpinnings of the Obama Code: George Lakoff
Edited on Tue Feb-24-09 02:11 PM by babylonsister
http://buzzflash.com/articles/node/7792

The Seven Intellecutal Underpinnings of the Obama Code: George Lakoff for BuzzFlash.com -- A Must Read
Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 02/24/2009 - 8:19am. Guest Contribution

A BUZZFLASH GUEST CONTRIBUTIION

By George Lakoff, Berkeley, CA. February 24, 2009.


As President Obama prepares to address a joint session of Congress, what can we expect to hear?

The pundits will stress the nuts-and-bolts policy issues: the banking system, education, energy, health care. But beyond policy, there will be a vision of America—a moral vision and a view of unity that the pundits often miss.

What they miss is the Obama Code. For the sake of unity, the President tends to express his moral vision indirectly. Like other self-aware and highly articulate speakers, he connects with his audience using what cognitive scientists call the "cognitive unconscious." Speaking naturally, he lets his deepest ideas simply structure what he is saying. If you follow him, the deep ideas are communicated unconsciously and automatically. The Code is his most effective way to bring the country together around fundamental American values.

For supporters of the President, it is crucial to understand the Code in order to talk overtly about the old values our new president is communicating. It is necessary because tens of millions of Americans—both conservatives and progressives—don’t yet perceive the vital sea change that Obama is bringing about. The word "code" can refer to a system of either communication or morality. President Obama has integrated the two. The Obama Code is both moral and linguistic at once. The President is using his enormous skills as a communicator to express a moral system. As he has said, budgets are moral documents. His economic program is tied to his moral system and is discussed in the Code, as are just about all of his other policies.

snip//

Summary

The Obama Code is based on seven deep, insightful, and subtle intellectual moves. What President Obama has been attempting in his speeches is a return to the original frames of the Framers, reconstituting what it means to be an American, to be patriotic, to be a citizen and to share in both the sacrifices and the glories of our country. In seeking "bipartisan" support, he is looking beyond political affiliations to those who share those values on particular issues. In his economic plan, he is attempting to realign our economy with the moral missions of government: protection and empowerment for all.

The president hasn’t fooled the radical ideological conservatives in Congress. They know progressive values when they see them — and they see them in their own colleagues and constituents too often for comfort. The radical conservatives are aware that this economic crisis threatens not only their political support, but the very underpinnings of conservative ideology itself. Nonetheless, their brains have not been changed by facts. Movement conservatives are not fading away. They think their conservative values are the real American values. They still have their message machine and they are going to make the most of it. The ratings for Fox News and Rush Limbaugh are rising. Without a countervailing communications system on the Democratic side, they can create a lot of trouble, not just for the president, not just for the nation, but on a global scale, for the environmental and economic future of the world.


George Lakoff is Goldman Distinguished Professor of Cognitive Science and Linguistics at the University of California at Berkeley. He is the author of The Political Mind and Don’t Think of an Elephant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Prometheus Bound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 02:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. He's sure got a point about the conservative message machine. Mad Krauthammer, for example
The conservative message machine is huge and still going. There are dozens of conservative think tanks, many with very large communications budgets. The conservative leadership institutes are continuing to turn out thousands of trained conservative spokespeople every year. The conservative apparatus for language creation is still functioning. Conservative talking points are still going out to their network of spokespeople, who still being booked on tv and radio around the country. About 80% of the talking heads on tv are conservatives. Rush Limbaugh and Fox News are as strong as ever. There are now progressive voices on MSNBC, Comedy Central, and Air America, but they are still overwhelmed by Right’s enormous megaphone. Republicans in Congress can count on overwhelming message support in their home districts and home states. That is one reason why they were able to stonewall on the President’s stimulus package. They had no serious media competition at home pounding out the Obama vision day after day.

Iraq: Good News Is No News
Charles Krauthammer
Despite Obama's opposition, America went on to create a small miracle in the heart of the Arab Middle East.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/12/AR2009021203012.html

Biden's Obama prophecy comes true
Charles Krauthammer
The Biden prophecy has come to pass. Our wacky veep, momentarily inspired, had predicted last October that "it will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama." Biden probably had in mind an eve-of-the-apocalypse drama like the Cuban Missile Crisis. Instead, Obama's challenges have come in smaller bites. Some are deliberate threats to U.S. interests, others mere probes to ascertain whether the new president has any spine.

Preliminary X-rays are not very encouraging.


......I would like to think the supine posture is attributable to a rookie leader otherwise preoccupied (i.e. domestically), leading a foreign policy team as yet unorganized if not disoriented. But when the State Department says Venezuelan Hugo Chavez's president-for-life referendum, which was preceded by a sham government-controlled campaign featuring the tear-gassing of the opposition, was "for the most part ... a process that was fully consistent with democratic process," you have to wonder if Month One is not a harbinger of things to come.
http://www.detnews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090222/OPINION03/902220304/1007/rss07
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
2. values vs programs
Obama is stressing the underlying values that are behind programs rather than clinging to the programs themselves. As it says in the article:

The potential pushback will come not just from conservatives who do not share his values, but just as much from progressives who make the mistake of thinking that programs are values and that progressivism is defined by a list of programs. When some of those programs are cut as economically secondary or as unessential, their defenders will inevitably see this as a conservative move rather than a move within an overall moral vision they share with the President.

I think I'm getting what he is saying. Wouldn't an underlying value be that all American citizens are entitled to have food, for example? So the Food Stamps program would fit this value. So if Obama changes the Food Stamp program in some way, before we freak out about it we should check to see if the underlying value is being fulfilled. Am I understanding this right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Without having to have some catchy name for the programs - which
is what the Repugs always offer - lotsa sizzle, little steak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. You got it
George Lakoff should be required reading for all Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. This seems like a solid foundation. on which to build.
I also believe tying radical and conservative together is a good and truthful use of words.

Thanks for the thread, babylonsister.:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
5. Fascinating read.
I thought this was especially insightful:

The conservative message machine is huge and still going. There are dozens of conservative think tanks, many with very large communications budgets. The conservative leadership institutes are continuing to turn out thousands of trained conservative spokespeople every year. The conservative apparatus for language creation is still functioning. Conservative talking points are still going out to their network of spokespeople, who still being booked on tv and radio around the country. About 80% of the talking heads on tv are conservatives. Rush Limbaugh and Fox News are as strong as ever. There are now progressive voices on MSNBC, Comedy Central, and Air America, but they are still overwhelmed by Right’s enormous megaphone. Republicans in Congress can count on overwhelming message support in their home districts and home states. That is one reason why they were able to stonewall on the President’s stimulus package. They had no serious media competition at home pounding out the Obama vision day after day.

Such national, day-by-day media competition is necessary. Democrats need to build it. Democratic think tanks are strong on policy and programs, but weak on values and vision. Without the moral arguments based on the Obama values and vision, the policymakers will most likely be unable to regularly address both independent voters and the Limbaugh-FoxNews audiences in conservative Republican strongholds.

The president and his administration cannot build such a communication system, nor can the Democrats in Congress. The DNC does not have the resources. It will be up to supporters of the Obama values, not just supporters on the issues, to put such a system in place. Despite all the organizing strength of Obama supporters, no such organizing effort is now going on. If none is put together, the movement conservatives will face few challenges of fundamental values in their home constituencies and will be able to go on stonewalling with impunity. That will make the president’s vision that much harder to carry out.


The last paragraph is downright chilling.

Thanks B. :kick: and a Rec.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. "Without a countervailing communications system on the Democratic side"...
Edited on Tue Feb-24-09 03:48 PM by Triana
...this is what I wrote here yesterday. Democrats (the WORLD) cannot afford to allow Republicans to dominate the national conversation and the message anymore. With the stimulus - it was a WEEK that piglickins were out there slamming the thing - and Democrats? Nowhere to be seen or heard.

We CANNOT continue like that. And now, there's hella lot more than an election at stake ie:

"they can create a lot of trouble, not just for the president, not just for the nation, but on a global scale, for the environmental and economic future of the world."

This is NO time to be snivelling, pathetic, passive, silent, subordinate, pantywaist Democrats a la Harry Reid. We need to be THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY. We need to be insidious, LOUD, and VIRAL.

I won't hold my breath waiting. Pfft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-24-09 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Democracy is all about public participation.
You only get out in results what you put in by showing up and saying what you think, by supporting politicians that support you and your views.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal_Christian Donating Member (387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. When are Republicans going to open up a History book????
-Hoover (the republican who turned a recession into a depression) coined the term "trickle-down" -it failed- but did we learn? NO! Sure enough, 50 years after that the GOP revived it calling "trickle-down" supply-side or "Reganomics" that just kept giving the upper percentile the largest tax-cuts and guess what; IT STILL HASN'T TRICKLED (unless you believe the right-wing induced idea that all the prosperity this country's ever experienced since the 80's miraculously originated with Ronald Reagan ). I love how the same people that tell you the president doesn't hold any sway or influence over the economy are the same individuals that will give Reagan credit for our prosperity and ending communism in Russia. Republicans keep trying to pass the same tired cool-aide speech about how Democrats want to raise taxes for YOU yes YOU! But if YOU are like most of the citizens in this country and aren't making over $250,000 a year than YOU aren't the "YOU" republicans are talking about. If you keep them 100% honest; the "YOU" republicans are speaking to are a very small minority of the selfish wealthy class of americans that believe in financial institutional anarchy (they call it "free markets" yet they cost everything). Think about it; more republicans voted "YES" on a bailout for banks and wall-street but EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM VOTED "NO" ON A BAILOUT FOR THE WORKING CLASS AND INFRASTRUCTURE.

-Barak Obama is doing what Franklin Delano Roosevelt did during the great depression. Government spending has not only saved our asses (The New Deal) but has caused many scientific and technological advances that have made our lives safer and easier from the space program, internet, computers, to the peace corps, health codes, and worker safety.

-Also, check our history, numbers don't lie, The Unted Sates Economy has always done better under a democratic president (by always, I mean ALWAYS). To add, the stock market has also done better under a democratic president since Dow Jones 1901. Again numbers don't lie, LOOK IT UP. There is no reason why anyone who is informed and has a conscience should ever vote Republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GeorgeGist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-25-09 08:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. Mr Lakoff would be well advised to think critically ...
about how the cognitive dissonance of the 'Founding Father's' extinquished the humanity of the native people of the 'New' world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 19th 2024, 10:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC