Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tom Ball - Top 27 Pieces of Evidence that Show Rice Perjured at 9/11 Comm.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 03:45 PM
Original message
Tom Ball - Top 27 Pieces of Evidence that Show Rice Perjured at 9/11 Comm.
Edited on Thu Apr-15-04 03:53 PM by papau
http://www.dailynewsonline.com/founder_ball_tom/2004_04_09_archive_article.php#108153301483552924

Top 27 Pieces of Evidence that Show Rice Perjured Herself in Front of the 9/11 Commission: A Reference for Seekers of Truth
Friday, April 09, 2004
By Tom Ball

<snip>Bush sends Adviser Rice, albeit quite begrudgingly, to testify in public and under oath. And what does she do? Well, being a non-partisan, ex-Republican, I hate to say she lied, so I will simply explain the situation and let you decide.<snip>


2) Rice equates Doing Her Job = a 'Silver Bullet'<snip>
3) Rice Misleads About the Predator and the Hunt for Bin Laden<snip>
4) Rice Spreads False Story (Pres Jet under attack 911) <snip>
5) Rice 'Never Anticipated' Airliner Attack<snip>
6) Rice's (Iraqi sent to the USA) 'Mushroom Cloud'
7) Rice's Nuclear Tubes (that weren't)
8) Rice's 9/11 'Opportunities'....(the target is not terrorism. The supposed suppression of terrorism worldwide merely offers 'opportunities' for the US to pursue its strategic agenda without geographic or temporal limits.)<snip>
11) Star Wars vs. Al Qaeda (Rice claimed that defeating Al Qaeda was Mr. Bush's first national security directive after he took office in January 2001: "not Russia, not missile defense, not Iraq, but the elimination of Al Qaeda.")...<snip>
12) Rice Puts a 'happy face' on Bush's Failings (... invade Iraq from day one is called "part of a broad global strategy"....Ignoring Al Qaeda before 9/11 simply reflected a more "comprehensive strategy" for going after the terrorist group....Bush's attitude toward the Taliban in the summer of 2001 was 'intolerant' and 'determined to uproot them'...But wait, as late as August, 2001, Bush was describing the Taliban as a great "source of stability in Central Asia" that would aid them in building an oil pipeline.)


Contact Tom Ball at tball@dailynewsonline.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
UrbScotty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. Only 27?
The testimony was a good 2 or 3 hours, wasn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Ted Rall" or "Tom Ball"????
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Time for my nap! - thanks for the catch!
:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-15-04 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
4. Who's responsibility is it to charge her with perjury?
I think CondoLIESa is definitely convicted in a court of public opinion. But how can she be legally charged? Will the Commission do this after they issue their findings? Can just one commissioner press the charge or do they have to reach a consensus. I would love to see her found guilty (of course Dumbya would pardon her) but I'm not going to hold my breath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 02:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC