Venezuelan National Assembly Discusses Limits to Concentration of Media Ownership

[Joanne98]

Mérida, July 10th 2009 (Venezuelanalysis.com) -- In a presentation before the National Assembly on Thursday, Venezuelan Public Works and Housing Minister Diosdado Cabello proposed reforms to the Telecommunications Law that would limit the concentration of private radio and television ownership and bring more cable providers under the jurisdiction of the National Telecommunications Commission (CONATEL) and the Law on Social Responsibility in Radio and Television.

"You can be certain that we will democratize the radio-electric spectrum and bring an end to large media estates in radio and television," said Cabello, comparing Venezuela's media magnates to Venezuela's elite class of large landowners.

According to Cabello, 27 families control more than 32% of the radio and television waves, with as many as 48 stations grouped under a single owner.

The long-time friend and ally of President Hugo Chávez proposed a limit of three stations for any private owner, and a limit of one half hour per day of uniform broadcasting on those three stations. Such a rule would favor Venezuela's small-scale independent producers, said the minister.

He also specified that broadcasting concessions are not inheritable property, so concession holders should not be allowed to pass on their broadcasting rights to family or colleagues in the event of their death.

With regard to cable television, Cabello proposed an administrative provision that would define any company whose programming is 70% produced in Venezuela as Venezuelan. This would require the company to register with CONATEL and abide by the Law on Social Responsibility in Radio and Television. Many cable stations have registered as international companies even though they are actually Venezuelan, to avoid government regulation, said Cabello.

"They'll all be in the same sack, that is to say, they'll all be national audiovisual producers if 70% of their production is considered to be Venezuelan," said Cabello, whose proposals will be open for public discussion for a month before the National Assembly proceeds toward a vote.

The minister presented statistics on the breakdown of radio ownership in Venezuela. Of the country's FM stations, 472 are privately owned, while 243 are local community-based operations and 79 are public. And, private owners control 184 AM stations, while the state controls 26 AM stations, according to the minister. In television, more than 60% of broadcasting concessions (65 stations) are in private hands, while just under 35% (37) are community-based and six are controlled by the national government. He did not specify the geographic range of the different signals.

To increase the state's share of the media, Cabello said the state will take over the 154 FM stations and 86 AM stations that did not register and pay fees to CONATEL by the July 2nd deadline, as requested by CONATEL a month earlier. "That which is not up to date with CONATEL will not have its concession renewed and the state will recuperate new radio spaces where the people are able to access information," said Cabello.

This measure has provoked opposition from Venezuela's Chamber of Radio Broadcasters, which called it "a direct attack against freedom of expression." In an official statement, the Chamber said the measure announced by Cabello "lacks basis" because all its members had "fulfilled all the procedures required by CONATEL since the year 2000."

Cabello responded that he would not negotiate with the Chamber, but he would be willing to negotiate with community-based and state-owned radio stations, and that a similar proposal for television stations is in the works.

The minister's proposals come amidst a media climate in which news outlets are highly politicized and openly engaged in a "media war" either for or against the administration of President Chávez. The private media has broadcast threats to assassinate the president and participated a coup d'etat against Chavez in 2002.

Continued>>>
http://www.venezuelanalysis.com/news/4613

[IndianaGreen]

1. We got our own problems with media concentration in America

and the fact that the Obama Administration has refused to bring back the Fairness Doctrine. Why do the Democrats complain about media bias when they themselves helped create it?

[troubledamerican]

2. Telecommunications Act of 1996. Signed by Bill C.

[Judi Lynn]

3. Thank god he was on our side! Supposedly it could have been worse otherwise. n/t

[IndianaGreen]

4. I know, he could have signed DOMA, and given us DADT

but wait! Good old philandering Bill did give us DOMA, DADT, and he kept SOA open. What a pal!