Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Keeping the Dark Lord’s Secrets

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 03:57 AM
Original message
Keeping the Dark Lord’s Secrets
http://harpers.org/subjects/NoComment#hbc-90005416">From Scott Horton at Harper's

The Obama Justice Department has demonstrated few things more clearly than its commitment to keep the dirtiest secrets of its predecessors. One absurd example is the controversy over the notes from Dick Cheney’s fateful interview with FBI agents about his role in the outing of Valerie Plame, a covert CIA agent—an exercise that carried him to the brink of being indicted. The Obama Justice team is convinced that America is better off not knowing what Dick Cheney told the G-men. In support of this view, it advances some dubious propositions.

Consider this passage from the Justice Department’s brief:

“These privileges belong to the government. The presidential communications privilege belongs to the President; the deliberative process privilege asserted here belongs to the White House; and the law enforcement privilege asserted here belongs to DOJ. A government official, even one as senior as the Vice President cannot implicitly waive these governmental privileges by individually submitting to an interview.”

This passage has the cadence and breathlessness of Gollum of the Lord of the Rings talking about “my precious.” The ring made its wearer secret and brought him into communion with the Dark Forces. The deeper we reach, the more disturbing these claims of privilege become. What is the motive behind them? Not the protection of vital state secrets of any sort. The Justice Department representations to the court suggest the basest possible purpose: to shield a public figure from public ridicule over his inappropriate, indeed possibly criminal, conduct in high office.

Smith said the documents could be released years later for “historical purposes,” but shouldn’t be released now because they would be used in the “political fray.”


--
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 06:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. One of Many Troubling Trends in the Obama White House
I don't really think we won this one, if the result is more of the same.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. they're also replicating some of Bush's worst outrages . . .
signing statements, for example . . . here I had this fantasy that one of Obama's first acts would be to declare all of Bush's signing statements null and void . . . instead he's now issuing similar statements himself, telling Congress which aspects of the laws they pass he feels obligated to uphold . . .

not at all what I expected, that's for sure . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Not what many expected
But I don't know that those expectations were justified. It's the secrecy and torture tolerance around which there was real reason to "hope for change." But that's been quickly dashed.

===
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FiveGoodMen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 05:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Have you seen this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-24-09 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. thanx for posting n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC