Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So many officers are "acting appropriately" these days.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
caseymoz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 01:14 PM
Original message
So many officers are "acting appropriately" these days.
Edited on Wed Aug-19-09 01:15 PM by caseymoz
Source: AP

Ohio Police Say Officers Struggled with Man Inhaling from Aerosol Can

(AP) Police in Ohio say officers using a new Taser stun gun briefly set a homeless man on fire while trying to subdue him.

A police report in Lancaster (LANG'-kuh-stur), about 30 miles southeast of Columbus, says one officer had seen the man inhaling a chemical from an aerosol can Monday night. That officer and another then struggled with the suspect, and the Taser was used. A flame appeared on the man's chest, and officers patted it down.

Police Chief David Bailey says 31-year-old Daniel Wood was not seriously hurt.

The department's policy warns against using Tasers when flammable chemicals may be present. Bailey says officers acted appropriately.

Wood was charged with abusing harmful intoxicants and other counts. Court records do not list his attorney.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/08/19/national/main...


----------------

Yes, "acting appropriately" should me the new slang term for police "beating the shit out of somebody" or "setting a guy on fire with a Taser."

Never mind that if we were homeless and in some of these communities that don't allow the homeless to sleep, stand on the corner, walk through the neighborhood, or find a place to pitch their box for the night, we would probably be huffing something as well.

We know if a police chief says that a guy set on fire by police is OK, why, it must be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rcrush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Ok so the new penalty for doing whippets is being set on fire.
Gotcha! No more whippets for me!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM Martin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. The authoritarian boot lickers will be hear any minute
to defend this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-19-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Don't flame me, Bro'! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC