Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Vytorin Marketing is Back

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 12:46 PM
Original message
Vytorin Marketing is Back
http://www.counterpunch.org/rosenberg09012009.html

September 1, 2009

Promoting "Both" Kinds of Deception

Vytorin Marketing is Back

By MARTHA ROSENBERG

For a trip down memory lane visit the Dorothy Hamill page on www.Organizedwisdom.com.

You'll be told that despite osteoarthritis, the Olympic gold medalist skates "five days a week for up to three hours," thanks to Vioxx--and can even "continue touring with the show Champions on Ice!"

"Take Vioxx exactly as directed by your doctor," adds the site and, unblinkingly, "It was withdrawn from the U.S. market in 2004."

For another health redux visit www.modelinia.com where you'll be told super model Lauren Hutton was "the first television advocate for Hormone Replacement Therapy, the postmenopausal preventive treatment for osteoporosis, heart disease, colon cancer, and Alzheimer's."

It's a good thing for the drug industry that Americans have short memories and forget things like Vioxx quadrupling heart attacks and Hormone Replacement Therapy increasing them by twenty-three percent.

And, speaking of forgetting, that hormone therapy doesn't "prevent" Alzheimer's but increases cognitive decline in women and shrinks brains.

How else would Merck and Schering-Plough have the audacity to bring back the "two sources of cholesterol" campaign less than two years after their Vytorin marketing drew lawsuits from state attorneys general and a Congressional intervention?

And even as Merck and Schering-Plough, now in the process of merging, agree this month to pay $41.5 million to settle lawsuits with consumers and health plans who accused them of burying Vytorin's clinical trials?

After agreeing last month to pay $5.4 million to 35 US states and the District of Columbia to reimburse investigations into Vytorin related "violations of consumer-protection laws"?

Heavily advertised until 2008, Vytorin was supposed to solve both your food and family "sources of cholesterol." Ads saturated the air waves, pun intended, with a split photograph of eggs, ham and other cholesterol-dripping foods and an older person who can eat them now thanks to taa-taa, Vytorin.

Except that the glutton-out-and-pay-no-price promise wasn't true.

Results of the 750-patient Enhance study found Vytorin had no effect on the buildup of plaque in the arteries which is believed to correlate with heart attack and stroke.

Consumers, health plans, attorney generals and law makers were livid. Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) asked the General Accounting Office to investigate why the FDA would approve a drug to reduce artery-clogging plaque that doesn't reduce artery-clogging plaque.

Congressmen Bart Stupak (D-MI) and John Dingell (D-MI) wanted to know why Schering-Plough executive VP Carrie Smith Cox unloaded $28 million of stock between the end of the study and release of its results, earning her the moniker the Martha Stewart of Pharma. Schering-Plough had just paid $31 million to Missouri for bilking Medicaid with a different drug months earlier. Who can say incorrigible?

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
boobooday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-01-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. Vioxx put my Dad in the hospital, and almost killed my Mom
Caused internal bleeding for both.

I took it once, but never again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC