Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Iraq’s Basra loses half of its arable land (‘the Paradise of Aden’ turning into desert)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
sabra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 10:27 AM
Original message
Iraq’s Basra loses half of its arable land (‘the Paradise of Aden’ turning into desert)
Source: Azzaman (Iraq Daily)

The southern Iraqi city of Basra, known for its extensive arable land dotted with tens of thousands of farms, risks turning into desert, a senior agricultural official said.

Amer Salman, who heads the Agriculture Department in the Province of Basra of which the city of Basra is the provincial capital, urged the central government to extend a helping hand “before it is too late.” “I urge the federal government to allocate an emergency grant in order to save the (agricultural) sector,” he said. Otherwise, he added, “There will be no cultivation and agriculture in Basra for the winter season.”

Salman blamed insufficient water flow from the country’s sole rivers the Tigris and Euphrates as well as the agricultural policies pursued since the 2003-U.S. invasion.

...

Basra was once part of what historians called ‘the Paradise of Aden’ as the city was surrounded by a sea of date palm trees orchards and farms.

There used to be up to 30 million date palm trees in Basra.

But Salman said the number of orchards has fallen to 2500 from 5000 in the past few years.

Read more: http://www.azzaman.com/english/index.asp?fname=news/2009-09-01/kurd.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cassandra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Which "agricultural policies "?
Monsanto?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xithras Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-02-09 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Probably the flooding of the marshes.
Since the 1970's, and accellerating in the mid-90's, Iraq began diverting water from the southern marshes to the fields and farms around southern Iraq for agriculture. This was done as much to punish the Marsh Arabs as it was to actually grow more food, and is internationally considered to be one of the top-10 environmental crimes of the last half century.

When the U.S. invaded, the Marsh Arabs saw an opportunity to restore their homeland and blew up the dikes and levees holding back the water. The water rushed in, much of the swamp has grown back, and the Marsh Arabs are moving back into their homeland.

While that's great for the marsh dwellers, it has royally screwed the farmers who have been depending on that water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Messier.
There's a bit of a drought, first. So cities are taking relatively more water.

Syria and Turkey also aren't kind to Iraq's water needs. A lack of formal, enforceable treaties on water use is to blame for that.

In fact, in the last month or two the Marsh Arabs got into the news again because the restored habitat is drying up. The Marsh Arabs are moving away from their homeland again.

Iraqi agriculture also used to be tightly supervised. Part of the supervision was just plain central control for the sake of central control--the government bought all the food, after all. Some also made sure that certain important foods were grown (for feeding the population or for export); but some control was also environmental. Since 2003 there's been a bit of chaos, so agriculture hasn't been supervised very much.

Then there are the date palm groves. Iraq used to export a lot of dates. It was a cash crop. Since 2003 exports plummeted and farmers needed to grow something, so they moved away from dates. Palm trees have an advantage over a lot of other crops--they take less water and reduce erosion. Chop them down, plant veggies, and you need more water (and have more drought-prone crops), and you lose more soil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-03-09 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. I thought Saddam Hussein was the one cutting off the water. Another MSM LIE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC