Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Jeremy Scahill: Michael Goldfarb's Scurrilous Attack on Rep. Schakowsky and Me.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 05:55 AM
Original message
Jeremy Scahill: Michael Goldfarb's Scurrilous Attack on Rep. Schakowsky and Me.
Michael Goldfarb's Scurrilous Attack on Rep. Schakowsky and Me. (P.S.: Erik Prince is Not Valerie Plame)

By Jeremy Scahill

Michael Goldfarb of Bill Kristol’s neconservative magazine, The Weekly Standard, which has engaged in quite a bit of masturbation over how awesome Blackwater is, needs to give Rush Limbaugh back his supply of pharmaceuticals. Goldfarb has posted a story comparing the outing of CIA operative Valerie Plame to the unsubstantiated claim from a Blackwater/Xe/US Training Center spokesperson that Erik Prince is now on an al Qaeda “Most Wanted” list in the aftermath of reporting on the company’s role in the CIA’s assassination program:

"Eli Lake and Sarah Carter have a big scoop this morning on news that the CIA “has asked the Justice Department to examine what it regards as the criminal disclosure of a secret program to kill foreign terrorist leaders abroad.” As a result of those leaks, the head of the firm formerly known as Blackwater, Erik Prince, has ended up on an al Qaeda hit list. Given that there is just as much disdain for Prince among left-wing Democrats as there is in the al Qaeda organization, one shouldn’t expect too much concern about this development from those who screamed loudest about the disclosure of Valerie Plame’s identity. But the facts of the crime are eerily similar — with one key difference: this time it looks like the leak came from Congress and not the administration."

This idiotic comparison basically speaks for itself, but let’s be clear: Erik Prince is no Valerie Plame. Plame was a covert CIA operative who was outed because her husband, Ambassador Joe Wilson, was speaking out against the Bush administration’s lie-filled drive to the Iraq invasion. Prince is the owner of a mercenary force that has killed innocent civilians (mostly Muslims), put US, Iraqi and Afghan lives at risk regularly, is being sued for war crimes, has had its operatives indicted on manslaughter charges, is being investigated for arms smuggling, etc. etc. In other words, Prince and Plame are basically twins.

Prince, whose former employee described him as a man who “views himself as a Christian crusader tasked with eliminating Muslims and the Islamic faith from the globe,” would not need to be associated with a CIA program to be offensive to any Muslims, sane or not. Prince has done a pretty effective job of creating a reason for people of various faiths or political persuasions to despise him. Moreover, this story about Prince being on an al Qaeda hit list has one source: a spokesperson for Erik Prince (whose name the reporters from the Moonie publication, The Washington Times, whom Goldfarb praises for getting the “big scoop,” misspelled: it is Erik, not Eric).

<snip>

Finally, Goldfarb writes this:

"While the leaking of classified material damaging to America’s war against al Qaeda is a travesty, it does hold forth the delightful possibilty of seeing Reps. Schakowsky and Holt put before a panel of DoJ prosecutors while their core body temperature and heart rate are measured by the polygraph for any signs of lying. The thing about these investigations — like the investigation into the Plame affair — is that you never know who’s going to get caught in a lie."

Rather than respond, I trust readers to fill in the blank in responding to this one. Hint: try using these words: Bush, Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld, Wolfowitz, Tenet, Black, Krongard, Prince…

<more>

http://rebelreports.com/post/179799722/michael-goldfarbs-scurrilous-attack-on-rep-schakowsky
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 06:03 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
kleec Donating Member (117 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-05-09 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Thank You
Thanks for again putting the facts in order and telling it like it is. It is refreshing to read true journalism, the kind that was prevalent as I was growing up. I just shake my head at today's supposed 'journalists' that spew their propaganda, it is truly a shame. I read the book The Family and it is one that I will reread I am sure. Thanks for the facts. We in this country so need them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 13th 2024, 08:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC