Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Talks end 30-year US-Iran standoff

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 03:41 AM
Original message
Talks end 30-year US-Iran standoff
Talks end 30-year US-Iran standoffTony Allen-Mills

THE first formal talks between Iranian and American officials since the breaking of diplomatic relations almost 30 years ago have been given the go-ahead by President Barack Obama.

Despite warnings from Tehran that it will not negotiate on its nuclear programme, Obama decided on Friday to accept an offer of face-to-face talks that will also be attended by British, Russian, Chinese and other European officials.

The US decision to resume direct contact with Iran after years of mutual belligerence followed indications from Moscow that Russia would not support any new United Nations sanctions on Iran over its pursuit of nuclear technology.

The talks will be the first substantive contacts since the seizure of 53 hostages in the American embassy in Tehran in 1979.

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran’s president, vowed last week that Tehran would never halt its production of enriched uranium — the fuel used in nuclear weapons.

more:http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article6832266.ece
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 04:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Check the propaganda load in that last sentence.
Edited on Sun Sep-13-09 04:53 AM by Ghost Dog
As we all know, the low-enriched uranium being slowly manufactured by Iran's array of centrifuges is good only as fuel for its new power station (and is being manufactured under tight IAEA scrutiny).

So, why did this writer for Mr. Murdoch's British "news"paper feel the need to add that last incorrect and obviously deliberately misleading clause?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sabrina 1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-14-09 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Yes, the propaganda is becoming more and more
Edited on Mon Sep-14-09 01:19 AM by sabrina 1
easy to see. They need some new techniques.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost Dog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Sep-13-09 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. Not even on DU's agenda, apparently, maddezmom.














Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC