JohnWxy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-30-09 03:40 PM
Original message |
Here's a thought: "no public option?..then, NO SUBSIDIES for insurance companies." |
|
The insurance companies' idea of HEalth Care Reform is no Public Option and full subsidies for them..preserving their profits of course.
I got a better idea.
NO PUBLIC OPTION?......NO SUBSIDIES!
...and that's not all.
No Public Option.....no pubic paid-for insurance for CONGRESSMEN!
LET THESE GUYS BUY INDIVIDUAL INSURANCE POLICIES ON THE OPEN MARKET - like the uninsured have to (but can't afford).
IF Congress doesn't want to give people a Public Option why should we pay for your Health Insurance? Buy it yourself!
Republicans should support this. IT SAVES THE GOVERNMENT MONEY.
IF WE HAVE TO PAY SUBSIDIES TO INSURANCE COMPANIES, PEOPLE SHOULD HAVE A PUBLIC OPTION!
HEALTH CARE REFORM IS NOT AN INSURANCE INDUSTRY BAILOUT (Sorry, GOP).
If you agree why not share your thoughts with your Senators and Representative at www.congress.org
Don't let their only source of advice be from Insurance industry lobbyists!
|
SharonAnn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 12:20 AM
Response to Original message |
1. "no pubic paid-for insurance for CONGRESSMEN!" "pubic"????? |
druidity33
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 05:47 AM
Response to Original message |
Ironman3476
(82 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Oct-01-09 07:43 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Another Government Intrusion-Subsidies |
|
Surely the anti-government party would never stand for forcing mandates or subsidies into the private marketplace, would they? That would be un-american!
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue May 07th 2024, 01:22 AM
Response to Original message |