Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Thinking Outside the Box: What Obama Could Have Said

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 12:55 PM
Original message
Thinking Outside the Box: What Obama Could Have Said
Monday 14 December 2009

by: Lawrence S. Wittner, t r u t h o u t | Op-Ed


"<snip>

The major problem is that the president's action fails to go beyond traditional thinking about how to relate to overseas strife. Indeed, Obama's response to the messy situation the United States faces in Afghanistan is reminiscent of how an imperial or military leader would have responded a few thousand years ago. Have we learned nothing over these intervening years? Instead of resorting to outdated thinking, what if Obama had drawn upon modern instruments of international and interpersonal relations? What if he had adopted a program of change in the way the United States relates to the world? In that case, he could have delivered a speech - not at West Point (a symbol of the old thinking) but at the United Nations (a symbol of the new) - and said:

* * * Fellow representatives of the world community.

A bloody war currently rages in the nation of Afghanistan. Although the United States has contributed to this situation, many nations have been involved in invading, fostering violence in and occupying that country. Furthermore, Afghanistan's own people are engaged in a vicious civil war. For these reasons, and also because no single nation has sufficient wisdom, resources or legitimacy to deal with this crisis, I have turned to the UN Security Council and the UN secretary-general to help me resolve this crisis in a fair and peaceful manner. As a result, we have agreed on the following program.

First, in the following three months, the United Nations will dispatch 100,000 peacekeeping troops to Afghanistan. These peacekeeping troops will replace all foreign forces in that nation. As this process moves forward, NATO troops will not engage in attacks on hostile forces, and will open fire only if attacked. Similarly, the UN peacekeeping forces will not seek out military engagements, but will simply keep contending Afghan forces separated and maintain security.

Second, a UN Reconciliation Commission will call together the major political forces in Afghan life, including the Taliban, for negotiations on a peaceful settlement of their disputes. Following the establishment of an agreed framework for this settlement, a free election will take place for an Afghan government of national unity, with election monitoring done by the United Nations.

<snip>

But, of course, this was not the kind of speech Obama made. He was not thinking outside the box."


to continue reading-- http://www.truthout.org/topstories/121409vh4
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
truedelphi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. The Corporate- MIC strings attached to Obama do not let him think outside the box.
Edited on Wed Dec-16-09 03:28 PM by truedelphi
Sometimes I wonder if they let him think at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. yep. so much for the multi-dimensional chess game! He's going to have to
go against his conciliatory grain to get anything decent done. He has the potential....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC