Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nation’s Largest RN Organization Says Healthcare Bill Cedes Too Much to Insurance Industry

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 03:39 AM
Original message
Nation’s Largest RN Organization Says Healthcare Bill Cedes Too Much to Insurance Industry
The 150,000 member National Nurses United, the nation’s largest union and professional organization of registered nurses in the U.S., today criticized the healthcare bill now advancing in the U.S. Senate saying it is deeply flawed and grants too much power to the giant insurers.

“It is tragic to see the promise from Washington this year for genuine, comprehensive reform ground down to a seriously flawed bill that could actually exacerbate the healthcare crisis and financial insecurity for American families, and that cedes far too much additional power to the tyranny of a callous insurance industry,” said NNU co-president Karen Higgins, RN.

NNU Co-president Deborah Burger, RN challenged arguments of legislation proponents that the bill should still be passed because of expanded coverage, new regulations on insurers, and the hope that it will be improved in the House-Senate conference committee or future years.

“Those wishful statements ignore the reality that much of the expanded coverage is based on forced purchase of private insurance without effective controls on industry pricing practices or real competition and gaping loopholes in the insurance reforms,” said Burger.

Further, said NNU Co-president Jean Ross, RN, “the bill seems more likely to be eroded, not improved, in future years due to the unchecked influence of the healthcare industry lobbyists and the lessons of this year in which all the compromises have been made to the right.”

“Sadly, we have ended up with legislation that fails to meet the test of true healthcare reform, guaranteeing high quality, cost effective care for all Americans, and instead are further locking into place a system that entrenches the chokehold of the profit-making insurance giants on our health. If this bill passes, the industry will become more powerful and could be beyond the reach of reform for generations,” Higgins said.


NNU cited ten significant problems in the legislation, noting many of the same flaws also exist in the House version and are likely to remain in the bill that emerges from the House-Senate reconciliation process:

1. The individual mandate forcing all those without coverage to buy private insurance, with insufficient cost controls on skyrocketing premiums and other insurance costs.

2. No challenge to insurance company monopolies, especially in the top 94 metropolitan areas where one or two companies dominate, severely limiting choice and competition.

3. An affordability mirage. Congressional Budget Office estimates say a family of four with a household income of $54,000 would be expected to pay 17 percent of their income, $9,000, on healthcare exposing too many families to grave financial risk.

4. The excise tax on comprehensive insurance plans which will encourage employers to reduce benefits, shift more costs to employees, promote proliferation of high-deductible plans, and lead to more self-rationing of care and medical bankruptcies, especially as more plans are subject to the tax every year due to the lack of adequate price controls. A Towers-Perrin survey in September found 30 percent of employers said they would reduce employment if their health costs go up, 86 percent said they’d pass the higher costs to their employees.

5. Major loopholes in the insurance reforms that promise bans on exclusion for pre-existing conditions, and no cancellations for sickness. The loopholes include:


* Provisions permitting insurers and companies to more than double charges to employees who fail “wellness” programs because they have diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol readings, or other medical conditions.

* Insurers are permitted to sell policies “across state lines”, exempting patient protections passed in other states. Insurers will thus set up in the least regulated states in a race to the bottom threatening public protections won by consumers in various states.

* Insurers can charge four times more based on age plus more for certain conditions, and continue to use marketing techniques to cherry-pick healthier, less costly enrollees.

* Insurers may continue to rescind policies for “fraud or intentional misrepresentation” – the main pretext insurance companies now use to cancel coverage.

6. Minimal oversight on insurance denials of care; a report by the California Nurses Association/NNOC in September found that six of California’s largest insurers have rejected more than one-fifth of all claims since 2002.

7. Inadequate limits on drug prices, especially after Senate rejection of an amendment, to protect a White House deal with pharmaceutical giants, allowing pharmacies and wholesalers to import lower-cost drugs.

8. New burdens for our public safety net. With a shortage of primary care physicians and a continuing fiscal crisis at the state and local level, public hospitals and clinics will be a dumping ground for those the private system doesn’t want.

9. Reduced reproductive rights for women.

10. No single standard of care. Our multi-tiered system remains with access to care still determined by ability to pay. Nothing changes in basic structure of the system; healthcare remains a privilege, not a right.

“Desperation to pass a bill, regardless of its flaws, has made the White House and Congress subject to the worst political extortion and new, crippling concessions every day,” Burger said.

More: http://www.calnurses.org/media-center/in-the-news/2009/december/nation-s-largest-rn-organization-says-healthcare-bill-cedes-too-much-to-insurance-industry.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 03:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. The nurses get it.
How is it congress doesn't?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mopar151 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 04:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Drunk on lobbyist money.
Congresscritters need PAC money like a vampire needs blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, depakid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cadmium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wrong! The Nations Largest Nursing organization SUPPORTS the Bill.
http://www.nursingworld.org/FunctionalMenuCategories/MediaResources/PressReleases/2009-PR/ANA-President-Letter-Senator-Reed.aspx


December 18, 2009


Senator Harry Reid
Senate Majority Leader
S-221 Capitol Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-7020

Dear Senator Reid:

On behalf of the American Nurses Association (ANA), the only full-service professional
organization representing the interests of the nation’s 2.9 million Registered Nurses
through its 51 constituent member associations, I am writing to urge you to keep the
democratic process moving in the Senate by voting to end debate on H.R. 3590, the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

Nurses across this country have waited decades for this historic moment and the time is at
hand. While political maneuvering delays reform, our patient’s needs are not on hold.
The uninsured and underinsured continue to delay or forgo much-needed care; they
continue to arrive in the emergency rooms across the country for conditions that could
have been easily prevented with access to primary care—we are paying a high price for
inaction. Quality health care for all should not be a partisan or political issue.

While we realize that no piece of legislation is perfect, we also realize that doing nothing
is not an option. We know that passage of H.R. 3590 represents our only hope for much-
needed, comprehensive, and meaningful reform of our nation’s healthcare system.
America’s nurses understand the cost of inaction—we cannot afford to wait—it must be
done before the end of the year.

Once again, the need for fundamental reform of the U.S. health care system is critical.
ANA and nurses around the country are ready to work with you. We are almost there.
Please vote YES to end the debate on H.R. 3590, the Patient Protection and Affordable
Care Act and move the process forward towards a final vote of passage.

Sincerely,


Rebecca M. Patton, MSN, RN, CNOR
President
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 08:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Hogwash! Read the bullet points above
and then read what you just posted....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cadmium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not hogwash. I have read the bullet points. The OP says that
the NNU is the largest RN organization and it is NOT. Read the letter from the ANA - the largest RN organization -- that I posted.

Now the bullet points - do point out flaws with the bill. An accurate reading would be that one nurses organization the NNU feels that is is better to scrap the bill and one nursing organization, the ANA says support the bill despite its flaws.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 08:23 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. The ANA wants actual reform- and hence the tepid (at best) call for Reid et al to act
Edited on Tue Dec-22-09 08:23 PM by depakid
That's quite different from supporting this bogus legislation (which nurses of all people understand will not solve- but will worsen problems in the US's fragmented "system."

The only real arguments I've seen in favor of passing this are based on short term political inferences as to the Republican media spin and NOT on what's in the actual legislation- which, over the longer term will prove to be politically disastrous as people discover that they've been had- and the abuses continue while premiums rise and coverages degrade, this is going to be a political disaster rivaling Bush's war.

In addition to the above market incentives- consider the regulatory incentives:

Insurers are permitted to sell policies “across state lines”, exempting patient protections passed in other states. Insurers will thus set up in the least regulated states in a race to the bottom threatening public protections won by consumers in various states;

Anti-trust exemptions remain in place;

Insurers can charge four times more based on age plus more for certain conditions, and continue to use marketing techniques to cherry-pick healthier, less costly enrollees (adverse selection);

Insurers may continue to rescind policies for “fraud or intentional misrepresentation” – the main pretext insurance companies now use to cancel coverage.

Minimal oversight on insurance denials of care; a report by the California Nurses Association/NNOC in September found that six of California’s largest insurers have rejected more than one-fifth of all claims since 2002- and with ERISA preemption still in place, patient/insureds under group plans will have no adequate recourse in civil courts for bad faith claims denial.

Inadequate limits on drug prices due to a White House deal with pharmaceutical giants, disallowing pharmacies and wholesalers to import lower-cost drugs.

Good thing Obama told us that health insurers aren't bad people! 'cause people's lives and livelihoods now depend on them putting people over exorbitant profits- and will in America for the foreseeable future (or until the next round of meltdowns creates a climate for "change we can believe in).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cadmium Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-22-09 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. The call on Harry Reid to act by the ANA is a call to
move the bill forward. I agree with the ANA that if they dont move this bill forward, all the wonderful things that come with real health care reform will be dead in the water as they have in every failed attempt since Nixon. it is a crap shoot. Scrap the bill like NNU recommends and take chance that, despite the democrats loss, we can start over and successfully spend another year getting a perfect bill (not likely). Pass the bill and improve provisions incrementally over the years. (The American Nurses Association perspective).

I do find it annoyng that the NNU is billing themselves as the largest nursing organization. That distinction probably should go to the ANA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC