Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Tax on Workers’ Health Insurance Plans a Bad Idea

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:28 PM
Original message
Tax on Workers’ Health Insurance Plans a Bad Idea
Union workers are dead set against having their hard-won health benefits taxed by the government. These health benefits were won at the bargaining table, often at the expense of wage increases. In addition, union LGBT couples and families are doubly penalized for they are not considered "families" thanks to DOMA.

The tax on the misnamed "Cadillac plans" remains in the Senate version of HCR, despite efforts to have it stripped from the bill. USW's Jim Huber's words are representative of the rank-and-file, not only in USWA, but in the AFL-CIO.

December 11, 2009

Tax on Workers’ Health Insurance Plans a Bad Idea

USW Local 9477 Steelworker calls tax unfair at US Capitol Press Event


WASHINGTON, December 10 – The AFL-CIO leadership, the USW and other unions joined Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) today in calling for the elimination of a provision in the Senate health reform bill which would tax some health insurance plans.

“Imposing an excise tax on health insurance plans would be a disaster for millions of middle class Americans,” Sanders said. “Some of my colleagues would have you believe that the tax in the Senate bill only falls on ‘Cadillac’ health care plans, but the truth is that the plans this bill will tax are more like Chevrolets.”

USW Local 9477 Baltimore Steelworker Jim Huber, employed at Severstal’s Sparrows Point steel mill, gave voice to the union’s opposition to the proposed tax on workers’ health plans at press event led by Sen. Sanders at the U.S. Capitol. “We don’t need any more taxes on the working class,” Huber declared. “It’s just unfair.”

AFL-CIO Executive Vice President Arlene Holt Baker also spoke out at the event, saying: “There’s a right way and a wrong way to pay for health care reform. Our message to the Senate is clear: A tax on working families is the wrong way.”

Sanders has introduced an amendment to strike this provision from the Senate-introduced Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The US House passed version of a health reform bill doesn’t impose a tax on workers’ health plans.

“Imposing a tax on health benefits while working to ensure that all Americans have good health benefits isn’t just illogical, it’s bad policy,” added Sen. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), a co-sponsor of Sanders’ amendment. “We want Americans to have dental coverage. We want Americans to have vision coverage. We cannot then penalize Americans that already do.” Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) has also co-sponsored the amendment.

The so-called “Cadillac” health insurance plans in fact can have premiums around $8,500 for an individual plan and $23,000 for a family plan.

According to Mercer, one of the largest employer consulting firms in the country, this tax would hit one in five health insurance plans by 2016. The Communication Workers of America (CWA) has estimated that this would cost families with a Federal Employee Health Benefits Blue Cross/Blue Shield standard plan with dental and vision benefits an average of $2,000 per year over the 10 year course of this bill, and individuals with the same plan can average $1,600 a year over the same period. As health care costs continue to rise, the tax will hit more and more health care plans. By 2019, it will burden one in three.

http://www.usw.org/media_center/news_articles?id=0464
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. k&r for the truth. This bill is a very bad idea. n/t

Kill the bill.


Forcing people to buy insurance is no more the answer to a failed health care system than forcing people to buy houses is the solution to homelessness.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. or make major changes in the Bill
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The House version doesn't have this tax because it has a public option
I hope House progressives hold firm on their core values and resist Rahm Emmanuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. I hope House Progressives stand firm and vote against the bill.
They said, quite firmly, that they would not support a bill that lacks a "robust" public option.

Kill the bill.


Forcing people to buy insurance is no more the answer to a failed health care system than forcing people to buy houses is the solution to homelessness.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
inna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. exactly. +1, nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. Who the hell come up with that idea anyway? The Unions
will certainly remember what party gave us that one come next November. I don't know who the Democratic party represents anymore they gave us NAFTA now this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kirby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-23-09 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Baucus n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC