elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-28-09 01:41 PM
Original message |
|
Krugman I’d suggest that we call the decade past the Big Zero. It was a decade in which nothing good happened, and none of the optimistic things we were supposed to believe turned out to be true. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/28/opinion/28krugman.html?ref=opinion
|
ixion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-28-09 01:45 PM
Response to Original message |
1. but zero implies no change (by itself, at least) |
|
so I don't think that is fitting. We lost ground in a big way over the past 10 years.
|
Skink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-28-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message |
2. A lot of day traders did pretty well. |
|
and Bush got those those tax cuts done and aided the military industrial complex. So atleast few people benefited.
|
damntexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-28-09 02:17 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Much better name is one I've used several years: The Oh-Ohs. |
|
And eight years of Dubya really did make for oh-ohs.
|
yurbud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-28-09 02:27 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I still favor calling the decade the REIGN OF TERROR |
|
which would include both the war on terror abroad and the economic terrorism at home.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Apr 25th 2024, 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |