Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The lost decade for the economy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
dtotire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 07:23 PM
Original message
The lost decade for the economy
The lost decade for the economy

The U.S. economy has expanded at a healthy clip for most of the last 70 years, but by a wide range of measures, it stagnated in the first decade of the new millennium. Job growth was essentially zero, as modest job creation from 2003 to 2007 wasn't enough to make up for two recessions in the decade. Rises in the nation's economic output, as measured by gross domestic product, was weak. And household net worth, when adjusted for inflation, fell as stock prices stagnated, home prices declined in the second half of the decade and consumer debt skyrocketed.




more:(graphs)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/graphic/2010/01/01/GR2010010101478.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jan-01-10 08:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Bush and friends ruined everything they could get their paws on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Here's my vote for a "sustainable economy"
which is to say, one that is considered healthy not because it is growing, but because it provides a stable standard of living for a stable population, in a finite world.

There is no "economic growth" model which doesn't hit the wall at some point, given a finite resource base. We'd be much better, at this point, just getting off that bus completely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spooky3 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. here's a longer version of the story, now the most frequently emailed from WaPo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 10:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. One sentence from that reinforces my doubt:
"how do we get what I call a post-bubble growth model, one that is sustainable". Spoken by our president, who I do support. But still, every model of economic growth hits the wall at some point, in a world of finite resources. "Sustainable growth" is then an oxymoron, unless you limit the time you sustain it to, say, you own lifespan, or your own term in office, or something along those lines. In any case, thats just kicking the "collapse" down the road a little.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cabluedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. How does that model work in a world of ever growing populations?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Not very well
ever growing populations in a world of finite resources become ever poorer populations, increasingly stressed and increasingly prone to conflicts over what remains.

How well that describes our world really goes down to whether you think resources are finite.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
steven johnson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
5. Some calculate we've lost 15 years, taking dollar devaluation into account
Edited on Sat Jan-02-10 11:06 PM by steven johnson
The dollar has devalued 40% since 1998. So when people see stock valuations similar to those in 1999, these are based on dollars that are worth 40% less. We've lost more than a decade in inventment value. We've lost at least 15 years and there are some who say we haven't seen the bottom of the stock market yet.

Whenever I want to hear worst case scenarios, I read the Market Oracle.



We are told the credit crisis is over and that recovery is underway. We do not believe that. It is projected that as many as 300 more companies will default on debt in 2011. A default rate of 12 to 14 percent. That is up from 1% in 2007 and a long-term average of 4.5%. These are not just small firms, but companies with more than $100 million in assets as well. That doesn’t sound like recovery to us. What is very significant is that the 300-figure is based on recovery. Only 116 companies defaulted between 2004 and 2007. One of the groups hit hard will be commercial real estate. The figures are already bad, but companies and lenders have been buying time by using two sets of books, marking to model and refinancing. All that doesn’t change the big picture and that is with a recovery the situation will be bad, without recovery it will be dreadful.

The fund-less FDIC reports US banks may be making money gambling with leverage using TARP funds, but bank loans fell by $210.4 billion, or 2.8% in the third quarter, the biggest drop since the FDIC started keeping records in 1984. Those same banks booked profits of $2.8 billion reversing a $4.3 billion third quarter loss. Loans to businesses fell 6.5% and those to real estate 8.1%.

Small business cannot borrow and they created 64% of new jobs in the past 15 years says the SBA. We see that figure at 75%.

124 banks have failed thus far this year, up from 25 in 2008 and we could see more than 2,000 fail in 2010 and 2011.


The Credit Crisis is Not Over
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 12:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC