Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Concern as China Clamps Down on Rare Earth Exports

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 01:08 PM
Original message
Concern as China Clamps Down on Rare Earth Exports

Neodymium is one of 17 metals crucial to green technology. There’s only one snag – China produces 97% of the world’s supply. And they’re not selling
by Cahal Milmo

Britain and other Western countries risk running out of supplies of certain highly sought-after rare metals that are vital to a host of green technologies, amid growing evidence that China, which has a monopoly on global production, is set to choke off exports of valuable compounds.

A neodymium magnet, commonly used in motors, loudspeakers and other appliances. Neodymium is a rare earth elementFailure to secure alternative long-term sources of rare earth elements (REEs) would affect the manufacturing and development of low-carbon technology, which relies on the unique properties of the 17 metals to mass-produce eco-friendly innovations such as wind turbines and low-energy lightbulbs.

China, whose mines account for 97 per cent of global supplies, is trying to ensure that all raw REE materials are processed within its borders. During the past seven years it has reduced by 40 per cent the amount of rare earths available for export.

Industry sources have told The Independent that China could halt shipments of at least two metals as early as next year, and that by 2012 it is likely to be producing only enough REE ore to satisfy its own booming domestic demand, creating a potential crisis as Western countries rush to find alternative supplies, and companies open new mines in locations from South Africa to Greenland to satisfy international demand.

Amid claims that Beijing is using its rare earths monopoly as a tool of foreign policy, the British Department of Business, Industry and Skills said it was "monitoring" the supply of REEs to ensure China was observing international trade rules.

Jack Lifton, an independent consultant and a world expert on REEs, said: "A real crunch is coming. In America, Britain and elsewhere we have not yet woken up to the fact that there is an urgent need to secure the supply of rare earths from sources outside China. China has gone from exporting 75 per cent of the raw ore it produces to shipping just 25 per cent, and it does not consider itself to be under any obligation to ensure supplies of rare earths to anyone but itself. There has been an effort in the West to set up new mines but these are five to 10 years away from significant production."

After decades in which they were considered little more than geological oddities, rare earths have recently become a boom industry after the invention of a succession of devices, including iPhones and X-ray machines, which rely on their specific properties.

Global demand has tripled from 40,000 tons to 120,000 tonnes over the past 10 years, during which time China has steadily cut annual exports from 48,500 tonnes to 31,310 tons.

Worldwide, the industries reliant on REEs, which produce anything from fiber-optic cables to missile guidance systems, are estimated to be worth £3 trillion, or 5 per cent of global GDP.

Beijing announced last month that it was setting exports at 35,000 tonnes for each of the next six years, barely enough to satisfy demand in Japan. From this year, Toyota alone will produce annually one million of its hybrid Prius cars, each of which contains 16kg of rare earths. By 2014, global demand for rare earths is predicted to reach 200,000 tonnes a year as the green revolution takes hold.

Nearly all of China's supply of rare earths comes from a single mine near the city of Baotou, in Inner Mongolia. The remainder comes from small and sometimes illegal mines in the south of the country, leading to devastating pollution from the poisonous and sometimes radioactive ores.

Environmentalists argue that this, coupled with widespread criticism of China's stance during the Copenhagen climate summit, adds to the need for a "plurality" of rare earth resources. One campaigner said: "There are legitimate questions over Beijing's control of these resources. Copenhagen showed they are not above putting national interest ahead of global efforts to curtail global warming."

Once extracted and refined, the rare earth metals can be put to a dizzying range of hi-tech uses. Neodymium, one of the most common rare earths, is a key part of neodymium-iron-boron magnets used in hyper-efficient motors and generators. Around two tonnes of neodymium are needed for each wind turbine. Lanthanum, another REE, is a major ingredient for hybrid car batteries (each Prius uses up to 15kg), while terbium is vital for low-energy light bulbs and cerium is used in catalytic converters.

In October, an internal report by China's Ministry of Industry and Information Technology disclosed proposals to ban the export of five rare earths and restrict supplies of the remaining metals. Beijing strenuously denied that the document was an accurate reflection of its strategy, saying it had no desire to reduce trade in rare earths. But The Independent understands that the level of demand in China means that supplies of at least two crucial REEs - terbium and dysprosium - are likely to be curtailed by as early as next year.

continued>>>
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2010/01/02
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FreakinDJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
1. China demanding an Unfair Trade Advantage
they simply play by 1 rule - as long as they have the advantage they will engage in Free Trade
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. the new petroleum
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Champion Jack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. When do we declare war on china?
Edited on Sat Jan-02-10 01:29 PM by Champion Jack
It is , after all, the American way
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
4. Canada and the United States actually have
terrific deposits of minerals containing those rare earth minerals. The problem is that mining and refining them is almost impossible in both countries. Mining is unpopular, environmentally, here, so those resources go untapped.

We have delegated the production of raw materials to China and the Third World -- to our detriment.

There are almost no minerals that we do not have, in abundance, in North America. We just have chosen not to engage in the mining and refining them, preferring to have China and the Third World take the environmental hit for that industry.

Labor costs, of course, also play a role, but mining is restricted more due to the environmental issues than economic ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gman2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Neodymium is/are a girl's best friend. Dont worry, we dont make anything, so we dont need any.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MineralMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Well, if she has a hard drive in her computer it is/are.
Rare earth magnets make hard drives possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 02:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Hah Hah Hah! "No Mineral We Do Not have, in abundance, in North America"
What the hell have you been smoking?

How about Cobalt?

For a guy whose Moniker is MineralMan, you sure are painting a rather rosy picture of the depleted nature of North America's mineral resources.

We may have these resources in abundance, it's just too bad that it isn't economically viable to extract them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
major debacle Donating Member (70 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. What part of the word "almost" don't you understand?
As in, "There are *almost* no minerals that we do not have, in abundance, in North America."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Grinchie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 02:28 AM
Response to Reply #9
16. Hello Peanut
As in Peanut Gallery.

Nice try to run defense for MineralMan, who attempted to pull a statement out of his butt, but his statement, and yours, is a big fail..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pissedoff01 Donating Member (163 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Also see:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
10. So is this "green revolution" really a solution if these elements are rare.
Wars for green energy... btw, when did cell phones and computers become green technology?

Seems to me the US would do well by itself to start a recycling program to procure the REE's that they can from discarded computers and cell phones.. etc. Of course, legislation requiring this would make us relavent in this race to "green"... however, our congress is soooo backwards they are still fighting about whether or not Climate Change is happening...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. The elements are not rare.
It is a term from waaaaay back when they were "rare" at a certain specific mining site in a single European country. I forget the details but check wiki. The ANTI_renewable energy lobby is yet again trying to create FUD (fear uncertainty and doubt) related to any energy choice that isn't fossil or nuclear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glowing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 10:51 AM
Response to Reply #11
18. Hmm, That makes sense. I didn't think about the "spin - propaganda" POV.
However, it would make sense to do some recycling... Why crowd the landfills? On avg, most people get a new cell phn every year to 2 yrs when their contract is renewed. PC's/ and laptops are constantly changing technology. It seems recycling components would be a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I think so too.
It is already more cost effective to recycle the wastes from solar manufacturing than it is to buy the same amount of materials produced directly from ore.

If you look at UN plans, they are heavily oriented (at least in theory) towards encouraging sustainable development.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Today Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good for them!
If these are rare earth elements, then some entity should be rationing them. It makes no sense, imo, to deplete rare resources in order to cure other problems we've brought upon ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Yay. The profit motive can only lead to a better life for all. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
14. If the U.S. didn't import almost everything from China, China couldn't exercise such power over us.
There is only one effective solution to this problem of China's denying the U.S. access to these materials. Place import duties and import quotas on Chinese manufactured imports, and start manufacturing goods in the U.S. again.

Such action would not only end the stranglehold the Chinese have on the U.S., but it would put Americans back to work, would reduce our trade deficits, and working and tax paying Americans would provide revenue to our national, state, and local governments.

The corporations, run by a greedy and essentially stupid managerial class, have sold America to China, and they were allowed to get away with it by corrupt and equally stupid politicians.

The terms "free trade" and "global economy" are right wing buzz words to stymie criticism of the failed practice of "supply side" economics.

Only production creates wealth. Consumption uses up wealth. Our former manufacturing companies, which now import goods from places like China and merely put their logos on it, are no longer producers of wealth. They are, in actuality, consumers of wealth, as are all middlemen.

To save the U.S. economy, and promote a recovery from the current depression, it is essential that the U.S. reverse the outsourcing of manufacturing jobs by imposing import quotas and duties on foreign made goods from low wage countries, such as China.

This is the only solution to the U.S. economic problems. Bailouts and stimulus packages are doomed to failure, so long as corporations can get away with outsourcing all the work to places like China.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-02-10 11:12 PM
Response to Original message
15. A possible alternative source of rare earth elements ...
Edited on Sat Jan-02-10 11:12 PM by eppur_se_muova
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-03-10 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yeah, we are supposed to be ramping a mine up out in the Mojave Desert too.
It's just going to cost more. Ah, here it is:

http://articles.latimes.com/2009/oct/14/business/fi-rare-earth14
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC