Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

//Was Harry Reid Right?//

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
shopgreen Donating Member (190 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 07:00 PM
Original message
//Was Harry Reid Right?//
very interesting indeed.

http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20100112/OPINION16/100111021/0/OPINION10/Was-Harry-Reid-right

//Was Harry Reid Right?//

By Omar Wasow
(c) 2010, The Root
The Senate majority leader has apologized for his remarks about race and color, but he was simply being honest about how voters react to skin color.

CNN is aflutter. Bloggers are calling it a “big-time” mistake. Newspapers describe the “racially tinged” remarks as “sensational.” What is this “juicy revelation?” Apparently, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid privately told two journalists in 2008 that Obama was more electable because he’s “light-skinned” and lacked a “Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.”

With the publication of Reid’s impolitic quote in the new book Game Change, journalists John Heilemann and Mark Halperin have landed a PR coup. By revealing Reid’s racial faux pas, they’ve also set in motion the now tediously familiar process of a media frenzy, an inevitable apology from Reid acknowledging “deep regret,” and an equally inevitable gracious acceptance of the said apology from Obama. Lost in all the hand-wringing and shock, however, is any clear explanation of what’s wrong with Reid’s comment. Clearly, using “Negro dialect” is about half-a-century behind the times, but does anyone think Reid meant ill by his anachronism?

Moreover, as the recent kerfuffle about the 2010 Census revealed, “Negro” is still used by a non-trivial number of older black folks. In 2000, for example, more than 50,000 people went the extra effort of writing-in that they identified themselves as “Negro” (over-and-above the millions who checked the box for “Black, African-Am., or Negro”).

And what term would you use? more......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
tblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. He wasn't wrong. And he wasn't talking about Obama.
He was talking about the electorate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That's the way it reads, yep
And having DEM pols who can read realities of the electorate is not a bad thing.

If people are gonna scream for Harry's head on a platter, it should be for the poor leadership in the effort to push the DEM platform, not for calling the electorate like he sees it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WileEcoyote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-12-10 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. I speak fluent Ebonics myself
Learned it from my Mexican buddies at work. Think they carry the whole thing too far though.

So i use slang of the 'hood a lot even when witnesses are around. Like when it's just me and the two dogs...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC