TrogL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 12:13 PM
Original message |
Semicontrolled demolition |
Don Caballero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 12:34 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Ha ha very good. 9/11 Truthers are morons |
|
So glad they have been discredited and debunked time and time again. They do not deserve a voice.
|
tabatha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 12:36 PM
Response to Original message |
2. That cartoon makes no sense. |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 12:36 PM by tabatha
As far as I can tell, the 911 truthers say that the planes did fly into the towers, but the towers would not have collapsed the way they did from just plane crashes.
BTW, the official story was that the towers pancaked down, despite the fact that no similar towers have been destroyed by fire before and since.
And if you want to see what true pancaking looks like, just look at your TV and see what resulted from buildings that pancaked. Where are the huge, billowing clouds of pulverized concrete?
I bet no-one will provide an answer.
|
Don Caballero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 12:38 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. 911 truthers claim all kinds of crazy stuff |
|
Some say the planes were holograms or cartoons, some say the planes were military planes. The reason no one listens to these kooks is because they are all over the place. They do not have one theory that coalesces with facts on the ground.
|
tabatha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I think you make up more than they do. |
Cheap_Trick
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
12. I wouls say 'ol Donny pulled that out of his ass |
|
but that would be hard since his head is in the way.
|
M155Y_A1CH
(921 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
7. The official theory doesn't gather either |
|
When you sense you are being lied to officially, you tend to try to fill in the blanks. :tinfoilhat:
|
abq e streeter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
11. You said that so much more succinctly than I did below----thank you, and well said |
TrogL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
13. That's the great thing about the comic - neither paradigm makes sense |
|
If you sum up the controlled demolition theory, they basically are upset because gravity doesn't work sideways.
The only way you can make any coherent sense out of the "official" story is LIHOP or MIHOP.
|
M155Y_A1CH
(921 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Oh, BTW Kick for a great toon! n/t |
TrogL
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
15. That's easy to respond to |
|
the towers pancaked down, despite the fact that no similar towers have been destroyed by fire before and since
What similar towers? It was the tallest (at the time) occupied structure in the world, built like a house of cards. What direction did you expect it to fall, sideways?
Where are the huge, billowing clouds of pulverized concrete?
I take it you didn't see the ground-level footage of huge, billowing clouds of pulverized concrete with dust-covered people running away in panic?
|
abq e streeter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 12:48 PM
Response to Original message |
5. Truthers are morons ...Amen. I personally believe every explanation put forward by Bush and Cheney. |
|
After all, they never lied about anything else that I'm aware of.
|
Don Caballero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
Of course the Shrub and Co lied about almost everything. But something like 9/11 is an event that idiot and his cabinet could never pull off. Do you see how much they screwed up Iraq and Afghanistan? How could they stage 9/11? Someone would have come forward by now.
|
tabatha
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
8. So that is why we know exactly who killed JFK and MLK. |
|
And why Mike Connell was killed, etc, etc.
Did you know that a Bush brother had the security contract for those buildings up until Sep 10, 2001? Sure, a Bush will come forward. In your dreams.
|
M155Y_A1CH
(921 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. You are being serious, right? |
|
I'm having a hard time distinguishing between candor and sarcasm on this thread.
|
abq e streeter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
10. I don't think they did it...But I believe NOTHING that they say happened ..about anything |
|
If they told me the sun is shining, I'd look for my raincoat. I agree many of the truthers are beyond the fringe wackos. But I also believe that something's REAL fishy about the 'official" version and needs to be investigated fully for the truth to come out. In that way, I guess I'm a "truther'..because I want the truth, and we ain't got it yet, and probably never will. And I think that the blatant lies that the powers that be ( and been) have spread about assassinations, from JFK on, 9-11, etc, and the covering up of what really did happen, have set up the "conspiracy theorist" industry precisely because the hiding of the truth has forced speculation that sometimes will inevitably go off on the wacko fringe end of things...
|
Recursion
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 02:27 PM
Response to Original message |
16. I kind of believe JFK was killed by two shooters with no knowledge of each other |
|
At least, my confidence in the ultimate irrationality of the universe supports that theory.
|
winyanstaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-18-10 03:21 PM
Response to Original message |
17. I agree...9-11 truthers are idiots... |
|
Edited on Mon Jan-18-10 03:25 PM by winyanstaz
As my right-wing brother-in-law, an ardent Cheney supporter and very Christian dude explained. ..(He should know..he reads the fire fighter's magazine AND he is a former fire-fighter himself!..Which makes him an expert according to my sister)... "Any fireman could tell you that the reason the third building fell down just like the first two even though it had not been hit by a plane is that there were UNDERGROUND TUNNELS connecting the third building! And that the explosions on the tops of the other two buildings ran down the elevator shaft and under the streets and then under that other building and came up inside building number three!" After that explanation I finely realized that I have been so badly mistaken in thinking that the 9-11 story was full of holes and that our government would ever lie to us. I am sure Bush and the secret service had some kind of a secret hand sign if he had wanted them to come and move him out of the line of the approaching airplane that could have been full of "tarrists" and the only reason that man walked up to the Commander-in-Chief of our military and defense and told him we were under attack and then turned away without waiting for orders.....was he already KNEW Bush bush was a kind and thoughtful man who didn't want to scare any little kids. :)
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Apr 24th 2024, 12:45 AM
Response to Original message |