Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Coakley-Brown Intangibles

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 01:20 PM
Original message
The Coakley-Brown Intangibles
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 01:20 PM by Pryderi
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2010/01/coakley-brown-intangibles.html

<snip>
So...stick a fork in Coakley, she's done--right? Not so fast.

First of all, any chance Brown had of sneaking up on her is now gone. The closeness of the race is generating high passions--cautious excitement on the right, worry bordering on panic on the left. But in Massachusetts you don't want high passion and level of attention on both sides if you're a Republican; you want an asymmetrical level of passion favoring your side. You want to catch the Democrats napping all the way through to Election Day. That almost happened. But Coakley and state Dems--especially the unions--and the White House all awoke before it was over. We'll see if they rose from their collective slumber too late.

Second, intangibles make for good copy but campaign media narratives tell an incomplete tale. Whatever unions and the Democratic machine are doing, and whether it will be enough or not, their actions are simply less newsworthy than a Sox-Yankees comment, or a Schilling blog post, or whatever Scott Brown did or said at a Tea Party rally.

Third, we'll finally get a certifiable test of whether the Obama political machine has applicability for Democrats other than himself. As Mother Jones' Nick Baumann reports, the White House has gone all in with the Organizing for America list Obama built in 2008.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. and sad that they didn't use the list for other post-inaug issues such as
single payer!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 04:48 PM
Response to Original message
2. A Boston liberal talk radio guy was on with Hartmann yesterday
he said that liberals and Dems in MA are "very discouraged" about the Big Insurance-written health care bills. They feel like Ted would think very little of the White House's efforts to get Americans health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
h9socialist Donating Member (584 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-19-10 04:50 PM
Response to Original message
3. You know . . .
. . . if Martha Coakley pulls this one out, it will be a joy to watch the Republicans tomorrow: trying to explain why their boasting the past week was what it invariably is -- a load of bullcrap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC