Centrism Died in Massachusetts

[Joanne98]

Obama needs to fight even harder for Democratic principles.

by Thomas Frank

The surprising results of last week's special Senate election in Massachusetts have exposed all manner of Beltway shortcomings, but none so forcefully as the terminal exhaustion of the professional pundit corps.

Consider the wretchedness of the advice presently coming in from all quarters of the Washington establishment. It might be summed up as follows: The Democratic candidate for Ted Kennedy's old seat was beaten by a Republican, Scott Brown. Only one conclusion can be drawn from this, apparently: that the public has gone decisively to the right. Ergo, so must the president. Barack Obama must capture the center, even if it means leaving his party behind. He must do as Bill Clinton did. When faced with opposition, capitulate! When that opposition grows, cave faster!

The president needs to pick a fight with members of his own party in Congress, the Sunday talk show sinecurists have murmured. That will surely help matters. He must embrace a sort of transcendent bipartisanship, suggests Fareed Zakaria in the Washington Post. He needs to learn, like the New York Times's David Brooks believes our ancestors did, to "tolerate the excesses of traders" because that's the only way to have "vigorous financial markets." Thomas Friedman, a man as consistent as he is banal, opines that the way to turn things around is by . . . embracing entrepreneurship.

The awkward thing is, President Obama has already spent a year following this traditional script. He has repeatedly let down his party's base. His all-important economic team is filled with protégés of Robert Rubin, the centrist hero of the Clinton years-whose image should be irreparably tarnished thanks to his role in bank deregulation, that great centrist endeavor of the '90s.

But not only is this advice wrong, its premises are, too.

Continued>>>
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2010/01/27-6

[xchrom]

1. Recommend

[Tesha]

2. This is a lesson Obama needs to learn but I don't think it's one he *WILL* learn.

Certainly not in time.

Tesha

[Vincardog]

3. If Obama does not learn this lesion now he will hear it again in November. I too would prefer he be

a GREAT 1 term president rather than have a mediocre 2 terms. Has anyone seen the Greatness yet?
I am not talking about anything he SAID.

[bvar22]

4. There is one option Obama did NOT mention:

...a mediocre 1 term president.

[Vincardog]

5. But he is steering straight in that direction, or worse a BAD 1 term