Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama Rewards Another Outsourcer (Honeywell)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
blue97keet Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:56 AM
Original message
Obama Rewards Another Outsourcer (Honeywell)
Obama Rewards Another Outsourcer
Alan Tonelson
Monday, March 01, 2010

President Obama’s decision to put Honeywell Chairman David M. Cote on the new bipartisan commission to reduce America’s debts and deficits is like putting Tiger Woods on a national commission to promote marital fidelity. And here’s why this unflattering comparison is eminently justified.

Like so many of America’s other manufacturing giants, Honeywell has long been a champion outsourcer, and the strategy has continued under Cote. Since Cote assumed the top job in 2002, Honeywell figures show that its foreign assets have remained at about 20 percent of its global assets. But through 2008, the American share of its workforce has sunk from 55.05 percent of the global total to 45.31 percent, as the company shed 2,000 domestic employees and hired 21,000 foreign employees. Final 2009 figures aren’t yet in, but news reports indicate that last year, Honeywell sent at least 1,100 more jobs offshore – along with the associated production work (in jet engines and elsewhere in aerospace, no less)

You don’t need the textbook economics brilliance of chief Obama economic advisor Larry Summers to figure out the problem. The new commission is supposed to come up with ways to fix America’s broken national finances. But the kind of outsourcing long practiced by Honeywell and its multinational peers has played a huge role in breaking them.

After all, as is clear from the massive collective trade deficits run by these multinationals (and documented by the Commerce Department’s Bureau of Economic Analysis), sending jobs and production abroad slashes U.S. net exports (and future export opportunities) and boosts U.S. net imports. In other words, outsourcing widens the chronic trade and current account deficits.

Meanwhile propping up American living standards in the face of these deficits requires ever more borrowing from creditors everywhere or asset sales to foreign interests. If you’re now thinking “credit bubble” and “worst recession since the Great Depression,” you deserve higher marks than the President and his aides.

Honeywell-type outsourcing also increases national indebtedness on a more micro-focused level. Since job exports typically lower wages as well as reduce domestic employment, they shrink the country’s tax base. At the same time, they increase demand for public services ranging from unemployment benefits to food stamps to counseling and other social services for individuals and families under stress.

Even worse, Cote’s appointment continues an Obama pattern of rewarding outsourcers with plum positions. As I wrote last year, he named two leading practitioners – General Electric’s Jeffrey Immelt and Caterpillar’s Jim Owens – as the only manufacturing representatives on his Economic Recovery Advisory Board (the so-called Volcker panel, named after its chair, the former head of the Federal Reserve – see http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2009/may/05/obama-needs-input-from-companies-that-stay-put/).

Someone with the President’s ear needs to tell him that “businessman” and “outsourcer” are not synonymous. There are plenty of American executives focused on creating jobs, production, and innovation in this country, rather than overseas, and with a proven record of success. Unless Obama starts seeking their counsel, optimism about the economy, and about his political future, will be painfully difficult to justify.

http://www.americaneconomicalert.org/view_art.asp?Prod_ID=3435
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Why are you posting right wing editorials from the dishonest Washington Times?
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 09:57 AM by NJmaverick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blue97keet Donating Member (390 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:14 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. The article is by Alan Tonelson, author of "Race to the Bottom"
Edited on Thu Mar-04-10 10:36 AM by blue97keet
who in turn references the Washington times.

An anti corporate globalist article or book is hardy a "right wing" agenda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. It's the WASHINGTON TIMES!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Is it not true? Did Obama not appoint these anti-American-worker people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. But he also appointed Andy Stern
How come you guys never notice what Obama is doing for you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:29 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Is there a list of "anti-American-worker people"
or was that decided by the Moonie owned WT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. Deleted message
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Vidar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 10:07 AM
Response to Original message
2. Recommended. Obama is no friend to the workers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. Wonder if Pres. Obama asked him about his offshore tax havens?
How about some promises for our countries workers! It's not called Honeywell International for anything:

As Defense Budget Soars Security Firms Reap Huge Profits, Go Offshore to Avoid Taxes
Tom Burghardt
February 15, 2010

http://www.opednews.com/articles/As-Defense-Budget-Soars-Se-by-Tom-Burghardt-100215-435.html

.....Considering that the Pentagon hands out some $396 billion annually to contractors, outsourcing everything from "in theatre" construction in places like Afghanistan and Iraq to pricey "intelligence analysts" at secret state agencies, cash not spent on payroll taxes by dodgy firms slices another hole into the already-shredded social safety net.

Amongst the largest firms cited in GAO's 2008 report, updated in January 2010, Oracle Corp., operates in 77 tax havens; Boeing Co., 38; Dell Inc., 29; BearingPoint Inc., 28; Computer Sciences Corp., 21; Fluor Corp., 34; General Dynamics, 5; Harris Corp., 13; Hewlett-Packard, 14; Honeywell International, 7; ITT Corp., 18; L-3 Communications, 15; Sprint Nextel, 7.

............

Hum........:rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Bravo. Good find.
Can not argue with facts and figures from the Gov.

Amazing...handwriting all over the wall and still people deny it is there.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Nice find. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Important to note, thanks for posting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 12:28 AM
Response to Reply #8
17. 1776 is in the house! You should run for State Represenative!
And, I doubt they asked him jack about his money....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. Thanks - I do what I can to spread the truth...
Edited on Fri Mar-05-10 09:44 AM by 1776Forever
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divine Discontent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-06-10 04:34 AM
Response to Reply #20
25. you do it well. Kick for the weekend crowd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
11. This is sickening. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
14. Amazing how this had close to 20 recs and now has 13....
Most have corporate types on this forum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Or people who know he appointed Andy Stern too
and think it's stupid to bitch about this and completely ignore the far bolder move of putting Andy Stern on the finance commission.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #15
22. Then why don't you post about Andy Stern? I think that sounds like a good post!
I don't get un-recing someones post because they didn't mention someone or something else that you feel is "more" worthy of attention. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #14
21. May I please ask how you can check how many rec's & un-rec's a post has?
Thanks! I always wanted to know that - And yes, I agree with you. I am still trying to grasp the thinking behind this un-rec stuff. I see no benefit to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I have no idea....however....
I was reading articles in this forum for a while and kept noticing the rec count for this particular thread disappearing.

This rec/unrec thing is a joke.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 06:32 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Thanks for the reply. I wondered if I had missed it. I agree with you!
Thanks again!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-04-10 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
16. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud2BlibKansan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
18. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Little Star Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-05-10 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
19. k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 01:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC