Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Physicians for a National Health Plan weighs in on HCR package.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
jotsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 10:15 AM
Original message
Physicians for a National Health Plan weighs in on HCR package.
Edited on Tue Mar-23-10 10:20 AM by jotsy
Senior members of the organization released this statement Monday, titled "A False Promise of Reform".

As much as we would like to join the celebration of the House's passage of the health bill last night, in good conscience we cannot. We take no comfort in seeing aspirin dispensed for the treatment of cancer.

Instead of eliminating the root of the problem - the profit-driven, private health insurance industry - this costly new legislation will enrich and further entrench these firms. The bill would require millions of Americans to buy private insurers' defective products, and turn over to them vast amounts of public money.

The hype surrounding the new health bill is belied by the facts:

* About 23 million people will remain uninsured nine years out. That figure translates into an estimated 23,000 unnecessary deaths annually and an incalculable toll of suffering.

* Millions of middle-income people will be pressured to buy commercial health insurance policies costing up to 9.5 percent of their income but covering an average of only 70 percent of their medical expenses, potentially leaving them vulnerable to financial ruin if they become seriously ill. Many will find such policies too expensive to afford or, if they do buy them, too expensive to use because of the high co-pays and deductibles.

* Insurance firms will be handed at least $447 billion in taxpayer money to subsidize the purchase of their shoddy products. This money will enhance their financial and political power, and with it their ability to block future reform.

* The bill will drain about $40 billion from Medicare payments to safety-net hospitals, threatening the care of the tens of millions who will remain uninsured.

* People with employer-based coverage will be locked into their plan's limited network of providers, face ever-rising costs and erosion of their health benefits. Many, even most, will eventually face steep taxes on their benefits as the cost of insurance grows.

* Health care costs will continue to skyrocket, as the experience with the Massachusetts plan (after which this bill is patterned) amply demonstrates.

* The much-vaunted insurance regulations - e.g. ending denials on the basis of pre-existing conditions - are riddled with loopholes, thanks to the central role that insurers played in crafting the legislation. Older people can be charged up to three times more than their younger counterparts, and large companies with a predominantly female workforce can be charged higher gender-based rates at least until 2017.

* Women's reproductive rights will be further eroded, thanks to the burdensome segregation of insurance funds for abortion and for all other medical services.

It didn't have to be like this. Whatever salutary measures are contained in this bill, e.g. additional funding for community health centers, could have been enacted on a stand-alone basis.

Similarly, the expansion of Medicaid - a woefully underfunded program that provides substandard care for the poor - could have been done separately, along with an increase in federal appropriations to upgrade its quality.

But instead the Congress and the Obama administration have saddled Americans with an expensive package of onerous individual mandates, new taxes on workers' health plans, countless sweetheart deals with the insurers and Big Pharma, and a perpetuation of the fragmented, dysfunctional, and unsustainable system that is taking such a heavy toll on our health and economy today.

This bill's passage reflects political considerations, not sound health policy. As physicians, we cannot accept this inversion of priorities. We seek evidence-based remedies that will truly help our patients, not placebos.

A genuine remedy is in plain sight. Sooner rather than later, our nation will have to adopt a single-payer national health insurance program, an improved Medicare for all. Only a single-payer plan can assure truly universal, comprehensive and affordable care to all.

By replacing the private insurers with a streamlined system of public financing, our nation could save $400 billion annually in unnecessary, wasteful administrative costs. That's enough to cover all the uninsured and to upgrade everyone else's coverage without having to increase overall U.S. health spending by one penny.

Moreover, only a single-payer system offers effective tools for cost control like bulk purchasing, negotiated fees, global hospital budgeting and capital planning.

Polls show nearly two-thirds of the public supports such an approach, and a recent survey shows 59 percent of U.S. physicians support government action to establish national health insurance. All that is required to achieve it is the political will.

The major provisions of the present bill do not go into effect until 2014. Although we will be counseled to "wait and see" how this reform plays out, we cannot wait, nor can our patients. The stakes are too high.

We pledge to continue our work for the only equitable, financially responsible and humane remedy for our health care mess: single-payer national health insurance, an expanded and improved Medicare for All.

###

I see political success for the democratic party, but not a practical solution for the people in the passing of this bill. Was it the boss who did a song about one step forward followed by two back?

Edited to credit Common Dreams as my source for this article.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ixion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 10:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Great Article K/R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 10:34 AM
Response to Original message
2. Knr. These doctors sound even more incensed than I am.
It's too bad the doctors weren't more vocal about how difficult insurance companies are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jotsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. They tried .
The 'Mad as Hell' doctors who drove a cross country caravan to D.C. last year is a PNHP member. Next to no coverage in the MSM.

Single payer advocates were not invited to discuss the options under review in the political arena.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Instead they let Pat Buchanan blather on and on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jotsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 11:38 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. I turn off M$NBC every time I see that face. Not since his race rant on Rachel's show.
I don't even think he believes the crap he was spewing that day, just saying whatever it takes to make people talk about him. Ipecac.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-23-10 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yes, that is correct, and even without them, Americans overwhelmingly
wanted a lot better than what we received. Can you imagine what the support would have been like if the MSM
had given equal time to these individuals!

Thanks for posting the OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AdHocSolver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 12:29 AM
Response to Original message
7. As limited as this bill is, it can provide progressives a platform to run against Republicans...
...now in Congress in the 2010 elections. Progressives can point to Republican incumbents who opposed even limited reforms as not caring for the people, but fighting only for special interests who take advantage of them.

Putting a few more progressive Democrats in the Senate and the House of Representatives would provide a majority capable of passing legislation that would improve the elements of this bill.

We should not give up now, but work hard in the fall election to elect more progressives.

Two positive results of this bill are that it shows that most Democrats will fight for the people, and apparently all Republicans will fight against the people and for the special interests.

Let's use this fact to our advantage to elect more Democrats.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtotire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
8. We Still should have passed something
This is a work in progress. It should, and will, be improved as time goes on. A stronger bill probably would have gotten nowhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nightrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 09:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. thanks for posting!! kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC