Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Kagan in Context: Shafting Progressive Values

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 06:39 AM
Original message
Kagan in Context: Shafting Progressive Values
Norman Solomon

Posted: May 10, 2010 05:06 AM

Kagan in Context: Shafting Progressive Values

If President Obama has his way, Elena Kagan will replace John Paul Stevens -- and the Supreme Court will move rightward. The nomination is very disturbing, especially because it's part of a pattern.

The White House is in the grip of conventional centrist wisdom. Grim results stretch from Afghanistan to the Gulf of Mexico to communities across the USA.

<snip>

"During the course of her Senate confirmation hearings as Solicitor General, Kagan explicitly endorsed the Bush administration's bogus category of 'enemy combatant,' whose implementation has been a war crime in its own right," University of Illinois law professor Francis Boyle noted last month. "Now, in her current job as U.S. Solicitor General, Kagan is quarterbacking the continuation of the Bush administration's illegal and unconstitutional positions in U.S. federal court litigation around the country, including in the U.S. Supreme Court."

Boyle added: "Kagan has said 'I love the Federalist Society.' This is a right-wing group; almost all of the Bush administration lawyers responsible for its war and torture memos are members of the Federalist Society."

The departing Justice Stevens was a defender of civil liberties. Unless the Senate refuses to approve Kagan for the Supreme Court, the nation's top court is very likely to become more hostile to civil liberties and less inclined to put limits on presidential power.

<snip>

For more than 15 months, evidence has mounted that President Obama routinely combines progressive rhetoric with contrary actions. As one bad decision after another has emanated from the Oval Office, some progressives have favored denial -- even though, if the name "Bush" or "McCain" had been attached to the same presidential policies, the same progressives would have been screaming bloody murder.

<more>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/norman-solomon/kagan-in-context-shafting_b_569659.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Gonna Leap In Front of That Freight Train? Be My Guest
The man has an agenda, which unfortunately isn't anything a Democrat can be proud of. And no matter how much fleece it's wrapped in, I can still smell the rank wolf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Organize....
We out number "them" millions to one. Turn off the fucking tee vee propaganda, and let's organize our numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. And here's the rallying cry...
1. America has been highjacked by special interests, corporations having "free speech" rights, etc.

2. We can take America back, without bloodshed or great human suffering simply by applying the Constitution.

3. Our candidates will take an Oath that a) we'll ban "corporate free speech" and b) we'll pass term limit and other anti-corruption legislation to hold future elected officials accountable.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:50 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. 4. All elections are publicly financed
5. Corporations are not exempt from income taxes

6. The top income tax rate, for the wealthiest 5% of our nation will return to 1970 levels (we weren't "socialists" then)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. Good stuff, thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w4rma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. Kagan is a woman. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unc70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. I believe the "he" in #1 was referring to Obama n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. DENIAL is the word.
People don't want to believe what they know to be the truth inside.

This isn't change, this is continuation of a policy to push America more to the right.

And yet they'll be coming around asking for donations from progressives for the 2012 elections, and they'll be expecting support because "we're not quite as bad as they are."

And that's apparently the best anyone could possibly hope for. Some change. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. I won't donate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
66 dmhlt Donating Member (935 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. Kagan: "But you are NOT my people."
Including some context to Kagan's comment will add some insight:

When the Harvard Law chapter of the Federalist Society hosted the organization’s annual student symposium in February, hundreds of law students, academics and lawyers filled the chandeliered Grand Ballroom of the Marriott Hotel in Cambridge, Mass., to hear a talk by Judge David Sentelle, a conservative member of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Dean Kagan introduced the judge.

“I love the Federalist Society,” she announced, “But you are not my people.”
(Emphasis added)


Source: http://www.lawschool.com/berenson.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 08:23 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Nobody with a Sense of Law, Justice or History Could LOVE the Federalist Society
although she might have a fondness for certain members of it.

It's total bullshit she's selling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laststeamtrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-11-10 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
18. Maybe she said it because there's so many WASPs in the Federalist Society?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moodforaday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
9. Emptywheel at Firedoglake isn't happy either
and I trust her judgement:

Elena Kagan Will Be The Most Unqualified Justice In History | Emptywheel
http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2010/05/10/elena-kagan-will-be-the-most-unqualified-justice-in-history/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freebrew Donating Member (478 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. The most unqualified?
I can think of 5 ahead of her right now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Myrina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. Her main qualification is that she's "bipartisan".
POTUS seems to value that above all else, despite the fact that it's gotten him less than nowhere over the past 18 months.

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
13. A Federalist Society groupie.
Now she can sit with her loved ones. Scalia, Roberts, Thomas, and Alito!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 07:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Endorsed by the likes of Ken Starr
Very comforting to know that!

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-10-10 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
17. A pragmatic New Yorker
"Where I grew up — on Manhattan’s Upper West Side — nobody ever admitted to voting for Republicans,” Ms. Kagan wrote, in a kind of Democrat’s lament. She described the Manhattan of her childhood, where those who won office were “real Democrats — not the closet Republicans that one sees so often these days but men and women committed to liberal principles and motivated by the ideal of an affirmative and compassionate government.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/11/us/politics/11kagan.html?hp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 09:48 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC