Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Justice Questions Way Court Nominees Are Grilled.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:09 PM
Original message
Justice Questions Way Court Nominees Are Grilled.
Edited on Fri May-14-10 03:14 PM by elleng
Justice Anthony Kennedy decried the way some senators question Supreme Court nominees, defended President Barack Obama's pursuit of empathetic judges and rebutted the idea of activist courts in a speech Friday in south Florida.

Kennedy said the Senate should not try to determine how high court nominee Elena Kagan would rule on specific issues, but should focus broadly on whether she has the qualities of a good judge.

http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2010/05/14/us/AP-US-Supreme-Court-Kennedy.html?_r=1


He recalled a lighthearted conversation with Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, in which he noted he was the only member of the court from the West Coast, though there are already three from New York: Brooklyn-born Ginsburg; Queens-raised Antonin Scalia; and Bronx native Sotomayor.

If confirmed, Manhattan-born Kagan would be the fourth New Yorker on the current court.

''I said, you know, this isn't fair,'' he recalled. ''And she said, 'Oh no, we have Bronx, Queens and Brooklyn. We need Manhattan.'''


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Didn't Kagan herself previously describe the hearings as "'Vapid and Hollow Charade"?
"In 1995, after spending time as a staff lawyer on the judiciary committee during the nomination of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Kagan made clear her frustrations, 'When the Senate ceases to engage nominees in meaningful discussion of legal issues, the confirmation process takes on an air of vacuity and farce.'"

Seems to me that Kagan would welcome any discussions about specific legal issues... ? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She did.
and she herself would likely welcome meaningful discussion. Politics of the day may or may not allow for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Little Jeffy Sessions sure won't. He is insufferable...n/t
Edited on Fri May-14-10 04:10 PM by monmouth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. That was then...this is now
Edited on Fri May-14-10 04:27 PM by katandmoon
The White House Monday said that Supreme Court nominee won’t follow her own advice from 1995 in answering questions on specific legal cases or issues, supporting Kagan’s flip flop on the issue that she first made a year ago.

Kagan wrote in 1995 that the confirmation process had become a “charade” because nominees were not answering direct questions, and said they should have to do so.

But during a briefing with reporters in the White House, Ron Klain, a top legal adviser to Vice President Joe Biden who played a key role in helping President Obama choose Kagan, said that she no longer holds this opinion.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/05/10/elena-kagan-no-longer-thinks-supreme-court-nominees-should-have-to-answer-direct-questions/#ixzz0nwQuZC7D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneTenthofOnePercent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Flip flopping... a time honored tradition. She'll make a fine figure in politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Also known as changing one's mind,
as circumstances change. A time honored tradition in LIFE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katandmoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. True -- It's flipflopping only when it's the OTHER party doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. 'Flip-Flop' is a foolish characterization,
made up by repugs who in their wisdom do excellent 'spin.' We ALL change our minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bemildred Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-14-10 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. Well, let's admit it, most of the Senate are mediocre posturing buffoons.
But we elected them. And then they provided us with the current USSC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 10:02 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC