Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Controversial Salazar "Moratorium" on Gulf Drilling Was Only Verbal (Kieran Suckling 5/26)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:55 PM
Original message
Controversial Salazar "Moratorium" on Gulf Drilling Was Only Verbal (Kieran Suckling 5/26)
Jeezus. We go in MMS from DIY shit written in pencil to not putting it in writing at all?????



Controversial Salazar "Moratorium" on Gulf Drilling Was Only Verbal


For Immediate Release, May 26, 2010

Contact: Kierán Suckling, (520) 275-5960

Government Prof: "…so ridiculous that it defies understanding…"

Law Prof: "…moratorium does not even cover the dangerous drilling
that caused the problem in the first place…"

TUCSON, Ariz.— In response to a scandal created by Center for Biological Diversity research demonstrating that the Minerals Management Service (MMS) approved 19 new drilling plans ­after the explosion of BP’s Deepwater Horizon — all with exemptions from environmental review — Interior Secretary Ken Salazar announced on May 6, 2010, a moratorium on the issuance of final permits for “any new offshore drilling activity.”

Since then, the Department of the Interior, as well as President Obama himself, has repeatedly changed the definition of the increasingly controversial moratorium as ongoing Center research has shown that the agency was still issuing new drilling permits. The moratorium description has become steadily narrower as the Interior Department changes it to exclude whatever drilling permits MMS issues on any given day.

As currently defined, the moratorium is so narrow that it allows continued issuance of the exact drilling permit type that BP was operating under when the Deepwater Horizon exploded.

Daniel J. Rohlf, a law professor at Lewis & Clark Law School, told The New York Times last week that he was losing confidence that Salazar was capable of instituting needed offshore drilling reforms since “(t)he moratorium does not even cover the dangerous drilling that caused the problem in the first place.”

“Under pressure from the oil industry and an agency he seems incapable of controlling, Secretary Salazar has watered down the drilling moratorium to a point where it is virtually meaningless,” said Kierán Suckling, executive director of the Center for Biological Diversity.

“He seems more interested in political damage control than ensuring the Gulf of Mexico is protected from another oil-industry explosion,” said Suckling. “Salazar’s so-called moratoriums and reforms are little more than rhetorical dispersants designed to break up and hide the political scandal threatening to wash up on his shore.”

Yesterday, Interior spokespeople revealed why the “moratorium” has changed so often and caused so much confusion: It does not exist in writing. In keeping with the lax environmental oversight he allowed to reign at MMS, Secretary Salazar never communicated his moratorium to the agency in writing.

New York University Government Professor Paul Light told NPR yesterday that a verbal moratorium is “so ridiculous that it defies understanding. It could not be more important to enforce this moratorium and make absolutely clear to the oil industry what is and is not permissible. And yet you have the execution of a critical order that appears to have been basically done through the most casual way possible under federal law.”


Secretary Salazar himself became the victim of his confused, shifting-sands moratorium when he falsely told Congress that it stopped all new drilling in the Gulf of Mexico. Interior spokespeople told NPR that “the secretary misspoke at the hearing.


Background


Salazar’s 5-6-10 press release announcing the moratorium says:


“In a media availability after the meeting, Secretary Salazar announced that, as a result of the Deepwater Horizon explosion and spill, beginning April 20 — the date of the explosion — no applications for drilling permits will go forward for any new offshore drilling activity until the Department of the Interior completes the safety review process that President Obama requested. In accordance with the President’s request, the Department will deliver its report to the President by May 28, 2010. The only exceptions to the new rule regarding permit approvals are the two relief wells that are being drilled in response to the Deepwater Horizon disaster.”



His 5-7-10 press release says the same thing:



“Offshore Drilling Permit Applications Halted

Secretary Salazar announced that, as a result of the Deepwater Horizon explosion and spill, beginning April 20 — the date of the explosion — no applications for drilling permits will go forward for any new offshore drilling activity until the Department of the Interior completes the safety review process that President Obama requested. In accordance with the President’s request, the Department will deliver its report to the President by May 28. The only exceptions to the new rule regarding permit approvals are the two relief wells that are being drilled in response to the Deepwater Horizon disaster.”

When confronted with the fact that MMS has issued 17 new drilling permits since April 20, Interior spokespeople inexplicably denied that the moratorium applied to “any new offshore drilling activity,” saying that it actually only applied to drilling of new wells. This allows the majority of MMS drilling permits, including the kind used by the Deepwater Horizon, to proceed unabated.



Salazar subsequently told Congress (and Carol Browner told the media) that no new wells had been drilled since April 20. Confronted with the fact that new wells have been drilled since April 20, Interior spokespeople said the secretary was mistaken and that the moratorium only applies to new permits.

While the permit moratorium at least halts a minimal number of projects, Salazar has placed no moratorium at all on the approval of drilling plans without environmental review even though the president himself declared on May 14: “It seems as if permits were too often issued based on little more than assurances of safety from the oil companies. That cannot and will not happen anymore…We’re also closing the loophole that has allowed some oil companies to bypass some critical environmental reviews....”

MMS to this day is approving drilling plans without environmental review. Many are for ultra-deep water drilling, which is yet more dangerous than the Deepwater Horizon.



http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press_releases/2010/drilling-moratorium-05-26--2010.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. This is the way the Bush administration operated, but since it's Obama, it's ok
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dgibby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I thought Obama issued the moratorium and Salazar was just following orders. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. Memo to Salazar: Write this stuff down.
When you're helping to run a large nation, it works better that way.

Oh-- and while you're at it, tell your rubber stampers beneath you reading and signing things that walruses don't live in the GOM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bobbieo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:22 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. I do believe Salazar is Obama's WORST apppointee!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. Kick for visibilty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. kick. Where is the defense for this one?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. This is so incredibly sad. Even the people in charge can't control this unholy beast.

“You can bend it and twist it... You can misuse and abuse it...But even God cannot change the Truth.” - Michael Levy

K&R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. They CAN control the corporate beasties, they just have to choose to ...
Edited on Wed May-26-10 02:48 PM by ShortnFiery
relocate their moral compasses and STAND FIRM. :thumbsup:

We need to vote-out every damn corporate incumbent at every given opportunity UNTIL we get people who view representing their constituents as THEIR HIGHEST CALLING.

p.s. Knowing his personality, does anyone here DOUBT that a fired up Rahm Emmanuel could make LEADERSHIP decisions on behalf of the good people along the gulf of Mexico? If properly motivated and knowledgeable - that person could kick corporate a**.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. You make a good point. I am so tired of merely looking forward...
Edited on Wed May-26-10 03:50 PM by Spheric
I want to see some good ass-kicking coming out of Washington.

Damn, it is so way overdue.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nashville_brook Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
9. k n r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:18 PM
Response to Original message
10. WHY?
Why operate this way, even at this present moment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
12. Salazar's moratorium "does not exist in writing."
Heck of a job Salazarie.

Another competitor in the "Obama's worst cabinet appointments" sweepstakes. Move over Geithner, Duncan, and Holder...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
13. In other words, more empty PR bullshit from the usual source.
These people have no shame, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. USA today has it. And NPR. "Spudded". I learned a new word.
Edited on Wed May-26-10 04:20 PM by chill_wind
USA Today

http://content.usatoday.com/topics/article/Organizations/Schools/New+York+University/0gdS7ne2cZ0Y7/1


NPR--



(...)

The administration's statements about the ban on new drilling have been straightforward. "We've announced that no permits for drilling new wells will go forward until the 30-day safety and environmental review that I requested is complete," President Obama said May 14 in the White House Rose Garden.

Testifying before Congress on May 18, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar made it sound equally clear. "The president has been very clear with me: Hit the pause button," Salazar said. "We have hit the pause button."

The day of that hearing, the AP reported that MMS had approved at least nine deepwater exploration wells in the Gulf since the Deepwater Horizon oil rig explosion on April 20, with minimal environmental reviews.

'Best Information'

When asked about that article, Salazar criticized what he called "facts and figures and misunderstandings" that have been "flying from all directions."

"There is no deepwater well in the OCS that has been spudded — that means started — after April 20," Salazar testified. The OCS is the Outer Continental Shelf in the Gulf of Mexico.

Salazar added, "We have a responsibility to come up with the best information and the best facts with respect to all these issues."

But Salazar did not have the best information or the best facts. In an e-mail, Interior Department spokesman Matt Lee-Ashley wrote that "the Secretary misspoke at the hearing."

(...)

Looking For Ban Documents

One source of confusion is the apparent lack of an original document laying out all the details of the moratorium. Mike Senatore is with Defenders of Wildlife, another environmental group that is suing the administration.

"We have, in fact, been trying to locate and to actually get from the Interior Department something that actually documents that there is in fact a suspension," says Senatore.

In fact, two Interior officials tell NPR the drilling suspension was not put into writing.

"It was a straightforward verbal order to the director of MMS, which was then transmitted within MMS," said one official in an email.




more:

Freeze On Offshore Drilling Was Verbal Order

by Ari Shapiro

May 25, 2010
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=127114044
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hay rick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
15. Rhetorical dispersants...LOL
“Salazar’s so-called moratoriums and reforms are little more than rhetorical dispersants designed to break up and hide the political scandal threatening to wash up on his shore.”

Perfect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-26-10 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. LOL. I thought that was very apt, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC