Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Washington Post and transparency: total strangers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 09:55 AM
Original message
Washington Post and transparency: total strangers
Friday, Jul 9, 2010 07:10 ET

By Glenn Greenwald (updated below)

Earlier this week, I noted -- with multiple illustrative examples -- how media outlets crusade for the virtues of transparency while frequently exempting themselves. Establishment news organizations are, ironically, among the most opaque institutions. Recall how most television news outlets refused to provide anything but the most cursory comments in response to David Barstow's inquiries about the fact that they had employed numerous "military analysts" with multiple, undisclosed conflicts of interests and hidden participation in a Pentagon propaganda program, and to this date, have simply refused to tell their viewers about those revelations, let alone account for what they did.


The Washington Post has helpfully illustrated this dynamic with another glaring example. As I've written several times, one reason the case of accused WikiLeaks leaker Bradley Manning is so mystifying is because journalists such as Wired's Kevin Poulsen obtained and selectively quoted from, but stubbornly refuse to disclose, the unedited chat logs between Manning and Adrian Lamo, in which Manning allegedly confessed to these leaks. In addition to Wired, it seems clear that The Washington Post's Ellen Nakashima -- judging by this June 10 article she wrote -- also has some or all of those logs, and I thus wrote her this email on Tuesday:


Hi Ellen - I'm writing a piece on media transparency and original source material and wanted to ask about your June 10 article on Bradley Manning: did you obtain the full chat logs between Manning and Adrian Lamo from which you quoted? If so, did you consider publishing them in full, or at least with minor redactions to protect privacy and the like, rather than merely selecting bits and pieces to quote? Now that Manning has been charged, would you consider publishing those logs in order to allow your readers access to read them?



Thanks - Glenn Greenwald


Here's the reply I received yesterday from Kris Coratti, Director of Communications for the Post:


Hi Glenn, I was passed along your e-mail. Thank you for your question -- we don't discuss the details of our newsgathering.

Thank you again,

Kris Coratti


http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/glenn_greenwald/2010/07/09/transparency/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lost4words Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 10:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. After Ben Bradley and Kathrine Grahm the post changed
to just another puppet propping fish wrapper, I was a subscriber for 27 years!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-09-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, big changes, and not for the good. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC