Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Officials: Karzai Blindsided U.S. Embassy With Contractor-Ban Announcement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
maddezmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 04:05 AM
Original message
Officials: Karzai Blindsided U.S. Embassy With Contractor-Ban Announcement
Officials: Karzai Blindsided U.S. Embassy With Contractor-Ban Announcement
Afghan President Hamid Karzai failed to give the American Embassy in Kabul advance notice that he was about to issue an edict ordering private security companies operating in Afghanistan to fold up shop within four months. Two senior U.S. officials, who asked for anonymity when discussing sensitive information, tell Declassified that embassy officials had been talking for months with Karzai about what his government could do to clean up corruption problems involving such contractors, particularly contractors operating in the south of the country, whose important duties include providing security for official and private supply convoys. But the officials say that Karzai gave no advance notice to the embassy or other U.S. officials that he would attempt to address the problem with the radical step of trying to outlaw such contractors with the stroke of a pen.

The U.S. officials say that while the Obama administration is willing, if not keen, to work with Karzai to improve regulation or supervision of security contractors—and even to force bad ones out of business—setting a four-month deadline is impractical. If this deadline is enforced, the officials warn, it could cause chaos and put lives of both American officials and nongovernment relief workers in jeopardy.

One of the officials says that whatever happens, the U.S. has no intention of shutting down the operations of contract security personnel who provide critical guard services at the American Embassy in Kabul, operations the U.S. believes have to remain in the hands of private contractors to free up U.S. military personnel for more complex missions elsewhere. The other official notes that because the embassy grounds are technically U.S. territory under international diplomatic law, Karzai's government has no authority to tell Americans how to handle their security needs. One official also says there is no indication that Karzai plans to dismiss the private security contractors—presumably top-class international mercenaries—whom he employs to protect himself.

In fact, U.S. officials say, the edict on the contractors may well be just another manifestation of Karzai's mercurial personality, and may be an attempt to distract attention, both internationally and within Afghanistan, from issues that are potentially embarrassing to him, such as the pressure he has been putting on Western-supported anticorruption units that have been investigating one of his aides.

The two U.S. officials say they believe that the reason for Karzai's proclamation may have been an incident late last month in which five Afghans were reported to have been killed when an American Embassy vehicle carrying security contractors working for the U.S. security company DynCorp crashed into another vehicle on the road between the embassy and Kabul airport. The crash provoked noisy demonstrations near the American Embassy. An investigation by Afghan police later found that the embassy vehicle was not at fault for causing the accident. But U.S. officials believe Karzai seized on the incident anyway as a pretext for issuing his order to ban contractors.

more:http://www.newsweek.com/blogs/declassified/2010/08/17/officials-karzai-blindsided-u-s-embassy-with-contractor-ban-announcement.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-18-10 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Karzai to US: You're Not Listening!
I'm sure this is not the first time opposition to the mercs was raised in Afghanistan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC