Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unilateral Disarmament Has Destroyed the Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 06:17 AM
Original message
Unilateral Disarmament Has Destroyed the Democrats
For OpEdNews: Cenk Uygur - Writer

President Obama spent the first two years of his administration practicing political unilateral disarmament. He laid down his arms to reach out to Republicans, and they ripped his arms off and clubbed him over the head with them.

This idea of playing patty-cakes with the Republicans is enormously naïve. When is this administration going to get it through their thick skulls that they will never work with you?!

Now, if attempts at bipartisanship had no downside, then of course I'd be in favor of it. As a theoretical matter, trying to reach out to the other side and reach consensus sounds lovely. But it does have a downside. You don't get to make your own case as you're playing nice with the other side. They're hammering you day in and day out, and you keep your powder dry. You know what that ends up in -- a massacre.

And that's exactly where we are now as the Democrats are looking to get slaughtered in 2010. Gallup says the Republicans have a historically large 10-point lead in generic Congressional matchups. The president has gone from a 68% approval rating to the low 40's. He's lost nearly 25% of the country in his approval rating. That's a disaster.

So, the president has fallen and he can't get up. But more importantly, he can't figure out why he fell. It's because you let the Republicans push you down and you never even fought back. You only have two months left -- take the f'in gloves off, Queensberry.

http://www.opednews.com/articles/Unilateral-Disarmament-Has-by-Cenk-Uygur-100902-824.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. Unless the Democrats, including Obama, start to show a spine in the next two months, there
will be a massacre in November.

For many of us, we are aching for them to show anything that indicates that they are fighting for us instead of against us.

We will give them every opportunity, and then some more chances, to earn our support.

Our vote is there - it is up to them whether they keep it or throw it away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. K & R. This was the top rated diary at Daily Kos yesterday, for good reason. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theFrankFactor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. One Small Area of Disagreement...
Obama knows EXACTLY what he's doing. Look at who he surrounds himself with! At the highest levels the Democratic party is a fraud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. if he were a fraud (or a good fraud, anyway), he'd be out making a huge sales pitch for the dems
yes, he's going from state to state campaiging for selected dems, making the standard (yawn) presidential appearance/endorsement.

if he were a any good at being a fraud, he'd be on prime time television like he was campaigining for re-election touting his record and the major accomplishments from the democratic party and how the republicans suck.

frauds LOUDLY tend to their image and quietly do otherwise.

in this case obama seems content to let his image slide. he HAS accumulated a lot of good material for a barnstorming stump tour, but he hasn't done this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Preferably... Take the f'in gloves off, Muay Thai. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chill_wind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 11:25 AM
Response to Original message
6. "He laid down his arms to reach out to Republicans,
Edited on Fri Sep-03-10 11:29 AM by chill_wind
and they ripped his arms off and clubbed him over the head with them."

Yep. Who could have ever expected that?

:-/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maxsolomon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
8. I'd imagine there's a big roll-out planned for next Tuesday
and i pray that "we tried to cross the aisle and look what we got" is the centerpiece.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
9. What gloves have been on?
The "reaching out" I've seen from Obama has mostly been to more conservative Democrats. Other than some cabinet appointments I haven't seen him reach out much to any Republicans. What did Cenk have in mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #9
14. the republicans he has kept on, the ones he has offered new jobs to
as well as every legislation initiative, which he carry's on with, even after having his arms ripped off, and being beaten bloody with.

not to mention the conservative dems.

thats what Cenk, and the rest of the folks who are upset, have in mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 08:57 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. "Every legislative initiative"
But look back: the actual legislative compromises he's made have been with other Democrats, not with Republicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Oh
It must be all in our heads then :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Well, in a sense, yes
Common wisdom is just factually wrong, a whole lot, and I think this is a case of that. Obama's negotiations that I know of have been with important moderate/conservative Democratic senators like Baucus, not with Republicans. Do you know of any examples of Obama trying to come to a deal with a Republican?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. K&R Yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-03-10 08:22 PM
Response to Original message
12. The sheer amount of this dysfunctional behavior during the past 20 months has been astonishing
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wuvuj Donating Member (874 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
13. He and it (the demo party) are....
...responding to an electorate that is at least 50% FASCIST...for lack of a better word. Many of those who vote see nothing wrong with the behavior of the US in recent years...in fact they would like to see even more ugly...as with the good Germans and their idea of "restoring honor"?

The guiding principle seems to be...get elected? So how do you do this without kowtowing to the ignorant and ethically challenged?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. disagree, he would never had been elected, if that were the case - n/t

Where's the Change!?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bherrera Donating Member (600 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 09:21 AM
Response to Original message
17. it's the economy, that is all
The people tend to be impatient. Because the US economy is not in such good shape, they are blaming those in power. I also see a very strong propaganda machine with Fox news and the right wing media. The problem in the USA is caused by the way these guys are lying to the people. Eventually they'll realize Fox News is garbage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Recursion Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Well, no, probably not
The thing about propaganda and public narratives is they perpetuate themselves.

eg, if you ask most people they probably think Columbus was trying to prove the earth was round to a bunch of people who thought it was flat. That will probably be with us for centuries. People don't care enough to un-learn falsehoods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Paladin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 09:53 AM
Response to Original message
18. My Sentiments EXACTLY. K&R.

Historians a hundred years from now will still be discussing the way the Obama administration naively ceded the field to a bunch of no-nothing, newly-empowered Republicans and Tea Baggers, with hardly a whimper of protest.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tutankhamun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Historians will then lament that essentially nothing was done to stop global warming.
That is, if the planet is still inhabited by humans in 100 years. Civilization as we know it will be gone; that seems clear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
23. Dems have serious conflict of interest: their voter base and the donors they want
They want the Wall Street bucks, but Wall Street does NOT want progressive policies (ie, a business community subject to the rule of law and a strong middle class). Progressive voters (any Democrat who isn't independently wealthy and even a lot who are independently wealthy) do want to see business interests subordinated to our national interests and want to preserve and expand the middle class.

If Democrats spoke clearly and boldly to their voter base (and more importantly ACTED boldly) they would spook their corporate donors and hoped for donors.

Instead, they sound like a judge trying to come up with a ruling that would make both a rape victim AND her rapist happy. So it's either going to be vague much or not make any sense at all, and in either case, won't make anyone happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
24. This idea of playing patty-cakes with the Republicans is enormously naïve.
And they are still playing patty-cakes with the GOP when they blame Social Security for the deficit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mike r Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-04-10 07:41 PM
Response to Original message
25. You don't win by being a political masochist
time after time after time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-07-10 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
26. Kick n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 18th 2024, 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC