Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Op-Ed, The Atlantic: "How George W. Bush Can Redeem Himself"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:40 AM
Original message
Op-Ed, The Atlantic: "How George W. Bush Can Redeem Himself"


How George W. Bush Can Redeem Himself

Joshua Green



http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2010/09/how-george-w-bush-can-redeem-himself/62681/

Joshua Green is a senior editor of The Atlantic and a weekly political columnist for the Boston Globe.

Modern presidents don't retire -- instead, they embark on their post-presidency. Society demands that they take up some cause greater than themselves, as Jimmy Carter has done by building houses for Habitat for Humanity and Bill Clinton by working to stop the global spread of AIDS. The idea is to devote their time and celebrity to a worthier purpose than simply buffing their image for the history books, but a post-presidency properly pursued has exactly that effect. No president's legacy is more tarnished than that of George W. Bush, and in a few weeks he'll formally launch a campaign for rehabilitation by publishing his memoirs. Bush hasn't yet settled on a big issue. He should choose clean energy. Not only would it boost him significantly, it would also benefit the American economy and the planet.

To get the most from a post-presidency, the former chief must champion an issue of unassailable merit, though not one that appears crassly self-serving, desperate, or hopeless. The ideal issue is one whose outcome is still uncertain but that stands a good chance of prevailing someday, so that the ex-president would be credited for having made a decisive difference. The more difficult the fight, the better.

That's why clean energy is a wonderful fit for Bush. Right now, the issue is dead in Washington. But it won't be forever. And while this may come as a shock to some people, Bush can legitimately lay claim to a legacy that could serve as the basis for something larger. That legacy, buried beneath so many other things, has been all but forgotten.

On a personal level, Bush long ago embraced green living in his own home. His Crawford ranch, the "Western White House,'' is a marvel of clean technology that is built from discarded limestone, features geothermal heating and cooling, and uses purified wastewater to irrigate the garden.

As governor, he had a big impact on Texas. In 1999, Bush signed into law what has come to be regarded as a model renewable-energy standard -- the requirement that a certain proportion of the state's electricity come from clean energy, which often spurs innovation. This law helped Texas to become a leader in clean technology, especially wind power, and it surpassed the statutory requirements years ahead of schedule. Today, Texas generates more wind power than Denmark, and most states have adopted renewable-energy standards of their own. As president, Bush's administration promoted the objective of obtaining 20 percent of the nation's energy from wind power by 2030.

True enough, Bush did not do much to realize that vision during his time in the White House. He consistently opposed limiting carbon emissions, which most environmentalists and energy entrepreneurs believe necessary for clean technology to really take off. But a post-presidency is not meant to follow in a direct line from one's actions in the White House; freed from the strictures of electoral politics, its very purpose is to transcend them. Bush himself appears to understand this and is flirting with the idea: in a rare public appearance in May, he delivered the keynote address to the American Wind Energy Association's annual convention, invoking his Texas record.

Why should environmentalists want to embrace a president so thoroughly associated with oil (and worse)? The short answer is: because they need him. Last summer, the House of Representatives narrowly passed a climate bill, but it went no further. The fact that it died when President Obama was still popular and Democrats controlled the Senate by a decisive margin was a clear indicator that it will take more than just a partisan majority to bring about real change. It also showed that environmental concerns alone will not compel Congress to act. The challenge now is to broaden support.

The best bet to generate meaningful Republican interest is to press the business case for clean technology. A number of major companies, including Shell, Ford Motors, and Duke Energy, supported the House bill establishing carbon limits, but not enough of them to swing the debate.

Any venture capitalist will attest that clean energy is an idea whose time is coming -- the economic reasons for it are simply too powerful to ignore. The question is whether that technology, and the jobs that come with it, will arise in the United States or in China or India. Bush's brand of business-venerating Texas entrepreneurialism, and its impressive results, makes for a compelling pitch. He could make a real difference.

The economic case for clean technology is so strong that Bush could, if he wanted, simply ignore the environmental aspects that many conservatives find objectionable or overblown, and focus strictly on the business opportunities and concerns about American competitiveness. Conservatives would be more receptive if they weren't made to feel as though they were capitulating to a liberal cause. The result would be no less beneficial to all parties.

This evangelism would be no easy thing. The recent setbacks in Congress have thoroughly politicized the issue of clean energy. Bush would undoubtedly draw criticism and scorn from some quarters. But he could make his commitment confident that the issue will only grow over time, and with it his own stature. The point is not to grasp for an easy public-relations hit, but to gain a place in the vanguard of an important cause that will unfold across the long arc of a post-presidency.

One day, years from now, the world will have embraced clean technology, and we'll all look back at the poisonous struggles of today and shake our heads. What was all the fuss about? If he is shrewd, and manages to execute his post-presidency more deftly than he did his actual presidency, the world may also look back and wonder the same thing about George W. Bush.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bush should sit in a dark corner and eat his own shit..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Anything other than morphing from "The Decider" to "Clean Technology Czar"
The last thing the world needs to do is place another crown on his drunken head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dhill926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 01:10 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. a disturbing vision......
but appropriate sentence......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
global1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:59 AM
Response to Original message
3. There Is Absolutely No Way G.W.Bush Can Redeem Himself......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 02:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wow, what are they smoking at The Atlantic these days?
This is the same W who said "Who cares? I'll be dead."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt-60 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
6. F*ck Bush
I mean junior but it applies to all of them.
I saw enough of that smirking f*ck's face to depress me for a lifetime.
How could anyone believe a single word out of that lying mother f*cker's mouth?
That idiot c*cksucker facilitated the virtual destruction of my country.
If he falls into my hands he's got a date with a wood chipper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 03:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. GET REAL...the asshole is too fuckin lazy....in my book...he killed too many with dumb decisions
He was the worst of the worst...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 05:49 AM
Response to Original message
8. An oil man promote clean energy? Esp. *? Isn't going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. There Is No Compensation for the Damage W Caused to the Nation or the World
there's no way to redemption for this loser except the "saving" of religion, which he already subscribes to. Let his personal Jesus be his Redeemer.

And may his name live in infamy with Nero, Caligula, and other famous monsters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. I already refer to him as the Crawford Caligula
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
COLGATE4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. There is absolutely NOTHING Dim Son could do, in this life
Edited on Thu Sep-09-10 09:42 AM by COLGATE4
or the next that would even begin to redeem him for the deaths of some 4,700 of our finest young men and women, or for the horrific injuries to more than 30,000 of them, or for the thousands and thousands who now suffer from PTSD, let alone for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi civilians for which he is directly, totally and irrevocably responsible.:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Three ways Bush could redeem himself:
1. Demand that he be prosecuted by our government for his already admitted war crimes and do a public allocution on any issues where he is still protected by ''state secrets'' privilege, especially on the true motives for the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

2. Report to the Hague and demand that they prosecute him for war crimes.

3. Go to Iraq and Afghanistan, demand that they prosecute him for crimes against them, and until they start, he can pick through the rubble looking for missing dead, remove feces from the outhouses Iraqis had to use after we destroyed their infrastructure, and bath and care for the deformed children that resulted from the United States salting the earth of those countries with depleted uranium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-09-10 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
13. Two words
Hari Kari
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Editorials & Other Articles Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC